G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design vs GeForce GTX TITAN Z FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design vs GeForce GTX TITAN Z: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design

2019

Why buy it

✅GeForce GTX TITAN Z is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 60W instead of 375W, a 315W reduction.
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX TITAN Z across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).

GeForce GTX TITAN Z

2014

Why buy it

✅4.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 12 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌525% higher power demand at 375W vs 60W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX TITAN Z is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 4.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.6% in PassMark G3D (8,811 vs 8,589), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX TITAN Z makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX TITAN Z is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design vs GeForce GTX TITAN Z Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1140 MHz to 1335 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,589 points. Launch price was $229.

GeForce GTX TITAN Z

The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 28 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 705 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 5760 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,811 points. Launch price was $2,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design scores 8,589 and the GeForce GTX TITAN Z reaches 8,811 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX TITAN Z uses Kepler, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 5,760 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Raw compute: 4.101 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Boost clocks: 1335 MHz vs 876 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design	GeForce GTX TITAN Z
G3D Mark Score	8,589	8,811+3%
Architecture	Turing	Kepler
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1536	5760 ×2+275%
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.101 TFLOPS	5.046 TFLOPS ×2+23%
Boost Clock	1335 MHz+52%	876 MHz
ROPs	48	48 ×2
TMUs	96	240 ×2+150%
L1 Cache	1.5 MB+552%	0.23 MB
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	1.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design	GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design has 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX TITAN Z carries 12 GB. GeForce GTX TITAN Z gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 336 GB/s x2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) — a 1067.4% advantage for the GeForce GTX TITAN Z. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design and 384-bit x2 on the GeForce GTX TITAN Z.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design	GeForce GTX TITAN Z
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	12 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	288 GB/s	336 GB/s x2+17%
Bus Width	192-bit	384-bit x2+100%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	1.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 12 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design	GeForce GTX TITAN Z
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12
Vulkan	1.4+40%	1.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 1st gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design	GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Encoder	7th Gen NVENC	NVENC 1st gen
Decoder	4th Gen NVDEC	NVDEC 1st gen
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design draws 60W versus the GeForce GTX TITAN Z's 375W — a 144.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 700W (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design	GeForce GTX TITAN Z
TDP	60W-84%	375W
Recommended PSU	500W-29%	700W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 8-pin
Length	—	267mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	0-100%	3
Temp (Load)	85°C	80°C-6%
Perf/Watt	143.2+509%	23.5

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design (2019 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design	GeForce GTX TITAN Z
MSRP	—	$2999
Codename	TU116	GK110B
Release	April 23 2019	May 28 2014
Ranking	#299	#300

Search GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX TITAN Z on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.