GeForce GTX 280M vs Radeon R7 M360
GeForce GTX 280M
Popular choices:
Radeon R7 M360
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 280M is positioned at rank 120 and the Radeon R7 M360 is on rank 234, so the GeForce GTX 280M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 280M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M360
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R7 M360 is significantly newer (2015 vs 2008). The Radeon R7 M360 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 280M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 M360 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (4 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 280M.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 280M | Radeon R7 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R7 M360 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 280M and Radeon R7 M360
GeForce GTX 280M
The GeForce GTX 280M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 236W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 576 points. Launch price was $649.
Radeon R7 M360
The Radeon R7 M360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 585 points. Launch price was $109.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 280M scores 576 and the Radeon R7 M360 reaches 585 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 280M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon R7 M360 uses GCN 2.0, both on 65 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (GeForce GTX 280M) vs 768 (Radeon R7 M360). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 280M) vs 1.613 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M360).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 280M | Radeon R7 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 576 | 585+2% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 768+220% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 1.613 TFLOPS+159% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+67% | 48 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 280M | Radeon R7 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 280M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M360 has 4 GB. The Radeon R7 M360 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 280M | Radeon R7 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 4 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 280M) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R7 M360). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 280M | Radeon R7 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0)+8% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTX 280M) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 M360). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 280M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon R7 M360).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 280M | Radeon R7 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 280M draws 236W versus the Radeon R7 M360's 80W — a 98.7% difference. The Radeon R7 M360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 280M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M360). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 280M | Radeon R7 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 236W | 80W-66% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.4 | 7.3+204% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 M360 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 280M | Radeon R7 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $120 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $30 |
| Codename | GT200 | Tobago |
| Release | June 16 2008 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #802 | #576 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 280M and Radeon R7 M360
