GeForce GTX 480M SLI vs Radeon TM R9 A360

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 480M SLI

2010Core: 425 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon TM R9 A360

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 480M SLI vs Radeon TM R9 A360 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 480M SLI vs Radeon TM R9 A360 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 480M SLI vs Radeon TM R9 A360: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 480M SLI

2010

Why buy it

  • 115.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 233.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 30W.

Radeon TM R9 A360

2015

Why buy it

  • Draws 30W instead of 100W, a 70W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 480M SLI across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 480M SLI is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 115.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon TM R9 A360 instead at 2,060 vs 2,050, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 480M SLI is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon TM R9 A360 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon TM R9 A360 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 480M SLI has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 480M SLI vs Radeon TM R9 A360 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 480M SLI

The GeForce GTX 480M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 25 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 425 MHz. It has 704 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,050 points.

AMD

Radeon TM R9 A360

The Radeon TM R9 A360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,060 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 480M SLI scores 2,050 and the Radeon TM R9 A360 reaches 2,060 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 480M SLI is built on Fermi while the Radeon TM R9 A360 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 704 (GeForce GTX 480M SLI) vs 512 (Radeon TM R9 A360).

FeatureGeForce GTX 480M SLIRadeon TM R9 A360
G3D Mark Score
2,050
2,060
Architecture
Fermi
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
704+38%
512

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 480M SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon TM R9 A360 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 480M SLIRadeon TM R9 A360
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 480M SLI and 64-bit on the Radeon TM R9 A360.

FeatureGeForce GTX 480M SLIRadeon TM R9 A360
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 480M SLI) vs 12_0 (Radeon TM R9 A360). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GTX 480M SLIRadeon TM R9 A360
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12_0
Max Displays
2
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 480M SLI) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon TM R9 A360). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 4.2.

FeatureGeForce GTX 480M SLIRadeon TM R9 A360
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP4
VCE 2.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 480M SLI draws 100W versus the Radeon TM R9 A360's 30W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon TM R9 A360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 480M SLI) vs 350W (Radeon TM R9 A360). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 480M SLIRadeon TM R9 A360
TDP
100W
30W-70%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
97°C
Perf/Watt
20.5
68.7+235%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon TM R9 A360 (2015 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GTX 480M SLIRadeon TM R9 A360
MSRP
$0
Codename
N11E-GTX-A3
Tropo
Release
May 25 2010
May 5 2015
Ranking
#637
#711

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.