CPU
GPU
GeForce GTX 570
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 570 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 750 Ti offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 570 | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+60%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 570 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 570 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $40), it costs 38% less, resulting in a 61.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 570 | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+61.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($25) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 570 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GeForce GTX 570
The GeForce GTX 570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,930 points. Launch price was $349.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,900 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 570 scores 3,930 and the GeForce GTX 750 Ti reaches 3,900 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 570 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 750 Ti uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce GTX 570) vs 640 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 570) vs 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 750 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,930 | 3,900 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 640+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.405 TFLOPS+1% | 1.389 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 40+150% | 16 |
| TMUs | 60+50% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+200% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.63 MB | 2 MB+217% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 570 comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti offers 60% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 152 GB/s (GeForce GTX 570) vs 86.4 GB/s (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) — a 75.9% advantage for the GeForce GTX 570. Bus width: 320-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 570) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 750 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2.5 GB | 4 GB+60% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 152 GB/s+76% | 86.4 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 320-bit+150% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.63 MB | 2 MB+217% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11_0 (GeForce GTX 570) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 750 Ti). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11_0 | 12 (11_0)+9% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (GeForce GTX 570) vs NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 750 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs PureVideo HD.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD | NVENC 1st Gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD | PureVideo HD |
| Codecs | — | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 570 draws 219W versus the GeForce GTX 750 Ti's 75W — a 98% difference. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 570) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 750 Ti). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 145mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 219W | 75W-66% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 300W-45% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 267mm | 145mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65 |
| Perf/Watt | 17.9 | 52.0+191% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 570 launched at $349 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the GeForce GTX 750 Ti launched at $149 and now averages $40. The GeForce GTX 570 costs 37.5% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 157.2 (GeForce GTX 570) vs 97.5 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 570 offers 61.2% better value. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $149-57% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25-38% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | 157.2+61% | 97.5 |
| Codename | GF110 | GM107 |
| Release | December 7 2010 | February 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #497 | #501 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 570 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti
