GeForce GTX 570 vs Quadro K5000

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 570

2010Core: 732 MHz
Similar parts
··
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K5000

2012Core: 706 MHzBoost: 706 MHz
Similar parts
··

GeForce GTX 570 vs Quadro K5000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 570 vs Quadro K5000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 570 vs Quadro K5000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 570

2010

Why buy it

  • 13.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $2,150 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
  • Delivers 605.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.3 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 79.5% higher power demand at 219W vs 122W.

Quadro K5000

2012

Why buy it

  • 60% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
  • Draws 122W instead of 219W, a 97W reduction.
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 616% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,499 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 11.3 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 570 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 13.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro K5000 instead at 3,989 vs 3,930, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 570 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 570 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,150 cheaper on MSRP at $349 vs $2,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 605.5% (11.3 vs 1.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 570 vs Quadro K5000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 570

The GeForce GTX 570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,930 points. Launch price was $349.

NVIDIA

Quadro K5000

The Quadro K5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 17 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 706 MHz to 706 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,989 points. Launch price was $2,499.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 570 scores 3,930 and the Quadro K5000 reaches 3,989 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 570 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Quadro K5000 uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce GTX 570) vs 1,536 (Quadro K5000). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 570) vs 2.169 TFLOPS (Quadro K5000).

FeatureGeForce GTX 570Quadro K5000
G3D Mark Score
3,930
3,989+2%
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Kepler
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
480
1536+220%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.405 TFLOPS
2.169 TFLOPS+54%
ROPs
40+25%
32
TMUs
60
128+113%
L1 Cache
960 KB+650%
128 KB
L2 Cache
640 KB+25%
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 570 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K5000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 570Quadro K5000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 570 has 3 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K5000 carries 4 GB. Quadro K5000 gives you 60% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 320-bit on the GeForce GTX 570 and 64-bit on the Quadro K5000. L2 Cache: 640 KB (GeForce GTX 570) vs 512 KB (Quadro K5000) — the GeForce GTX 570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 570Quadro K5000
VRAM Capacity
2.5 GB
4 GB+60%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
320-bit+400%
64-bit
L2 Cache
640 KB+25%
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_0 (GeForce GTX 570) vs 12_0 (Quadro K5000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 570Quadro K5000
DirectX
11_0
12_0+9%
Max Displays
2
4+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (GeForce GTX 570) vs NVENC 2nd Gen (Quadro K5000). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs NVDEC 1st Gen.

FeatureGeForce GTX 570Quadro K5000
Encoder
PureVideo HD
NVENC 2nd Gen
Decoder
PureVideo HD
NVDEC 1st Gen
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 570 draws 219W versus the Quadro K5000's 122W — a 56.9% difference. The Quadro K5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 570) vs 350W (Quadro K5000). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 570Quadro K5000
TDP
219W
122W-44%
Recommended PSU
550W
350W-36%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
267mm
Slots
2
2
Perf/Watt
17.9
32.7+83%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 570 came in at $349, while the Quadro K5000 launched at $2499. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 570 was 86% cheaper ($2150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.3 (GeForce GTX 570) vs 1.6 (Quadro K5000) — the GeForce GTX 570 offers 606.3% better value. The newer card here is Quadro K5000 (2012 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GTX 570Quadro K5000
MSRP
$349-86%
$2499
Performance per Dollar
11.3+606%
1.6
Codename
GF110
GK104
Release
December 7 2010
August 17 2012
Ranking
#497
#492

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.