
GeForce GTX 580M
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 675M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 580M
2011Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce GTX 675M
2012Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce GTX 580M
2011GeForce GTX 675M
2012Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 580M better than GeForce GTX 675M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 675M make more sense than GeForce GTX 580M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 580M | GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 13 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 9 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 8 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 580M | GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 38 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 22 FPS | 22 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 580M | GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 21 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 580M | GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 21 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 580M and GeForce GTX 675M

GeForce GTX 580M
GeForce GTX 580M
The GeForce GTX 580M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,878 points.

GeForce GTX 675M
GeForce GTX 675M
The GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,855 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 580M scores 1,878 and the GeForce GTX 675M reaches 1,855 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 580M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 675M uses Fermi 2.0, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 580M) vs 384 (GeForce GTX 675M). Raw compute: 0.9523 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 580M) vs 0.9523 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 675M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580M | GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,878+1% | 1,855 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9523 TFLOPS | 0.9523 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580M | GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580M | GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 580M) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 675M). OpenGL: 4.0 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580M | GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.0 | 4.5+13% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 580M) vs No NVENC (Fermi) (GeForce GTX 675M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 580M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 675M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580M | GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | No NVENC (Fermi) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 580M draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 675M's 100W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GTX 675M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 580M) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 675M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 82°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580M | GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 95°C | 82°C-14% |
| Perf/Watt | 18.8+1% | 18.6 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












