
GeForce GTX 580M vs Radeon Pro WX 4130

GeForce GTX 580M
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 4130
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 580M is positioned at rank 176 and the Radeon Pro WX 4130 is on rank 186, so the GeForce GTX 580M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 580M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 4130
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2011). The Radeon Pro WX 4130 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 580M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 580M.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 580M | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro WX 4130 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 580M and Radeon Pro WX 4130

GeForce GTX 580M
The GeForce GTX 580M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,878 points.

Radeon Pro WX 4130
The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,890 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 580M scores 1,878 and the Radeon Pro WX 4130 reaches 1,890 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 580M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 4130 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 580M) vs 640 (Radeon Pro WX 4130). Raw compute: 0.9523 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 580M) vs 1.348 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4130).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580M | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,878 | 1,890 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 640+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9523 TFLOPS | 1.348 TFLOPS+42% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+60% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+220% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580M | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 580M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4130 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 4130 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 580M) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4130) — the Radeon Pro WX 4130 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580M | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 580M) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 4130). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580M | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.0 | 4.6+15% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 580M) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 4130). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 580M) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 4130).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580M | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 580M draws 100W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4130's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 580M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4130). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580M | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 50W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 95°C | 80°C-16% |
| Perf/Watt | 18.8 | 37.8+101% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580M | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $100 |
| Codename | GF114 | Baffin |
| Release | June 28 2011 | March 1 2017 |
| Ranking | #700 | #697 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















