GeForce GTX 670MX SLI vs Quadro K4000M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 670MX SLI vs Quadro K4000M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 670MX SLI vs Quadro K4000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 670MX SLI

2012

Why buy it

✅6.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.

Quadro K4000M

2012

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 670MX SLI across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 6.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (2,075 vs 2,061), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 670MX SLI makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 670MX SLI vs Quadro K4000M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 670MX SLI

The GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,075 points.

Quadro K4000M

The Quadro K4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 601 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,061 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 670MX SLI scores 2,075 and the Quadro K4000M reaches 2,061 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is built on Kepler while the Quadro K4000M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce GTX 670MX SLI) vs 960 (Quadro K4000M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 670MX SLI	Quadro K4000M
G3D Mark Score	2,075	2,061
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1920+100%	960

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 670MX SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K4000M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 670MX SLI	Quadro K4000M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 670MX SLI has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K4000M carries 4 GB. Quadro K4000M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 670MX SLI and 64-bit on the Quadro K4000M.

Feature	GeForce GTX 670MX SLI	Quadro K4000M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 670MX SLI draws 150W versus the Quadro K4000M's 100W — a 40% difference. The Quadro K4000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 670MX SLI) vs 350W (Quadro K4000M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.