GeForce GTX 670MX SLI vs Quadro P520

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 670MX SLI

2012Core: 600 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro P520

2019Core: 1303 MHzBoost: 1493 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 670MX SLI vs Quadro P520 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 670MX SLI vs Quadro P520 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 670MX SLI vs Quadro P520: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 670MX SLI

2012

Why buy it

  • 46.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 733.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 18W.

Quadro P520

2019

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro P520 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 18W instead of 150W, a 132W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 670MX SLI across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2019 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 46.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2% in PassMark G3D (2,075 vs 2,034), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro P520 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2012. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P520 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce GTX 670MX SLI still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 670MX SLI vs Quadro P520 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 670MX SLI

The GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,075 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro P520

The Quadro P520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1303 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,034 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 670MX SLI scores 2,075 and the Quadro P520 reaches 2,034 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is built on Kepler while the Quadro P520 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce GTX 670MX SLI) vs 384 (Quadro P520).

FeatureGeForce GTX 670MX SLIQuadro P520
G3D Mark Score
2,075+2%
2,034
Architecture
Kepler
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1920+400%
384

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 670MX SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P520 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 670MX SLIQuadro P520
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 670MX SLI has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P520 carries 4 GB. Quadro P520 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 670MX SLI and 64-bit on the Quadro P520.

FeatureGeForce GTX 670MX SLIQuadro P520
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 670MX SLI draws 150W versus the Quadro P520's 18W — a 157.1% difference. The Quadro P520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 670MX SLI) vs 350W (Quadro P520). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 670MX SLIQuadro P520
TDP
150W
18W-88%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
88°C
Perf/Watt
13.8
113.0+719%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro P520 (2019 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GTX 670MX SLIQuadro P520
MSRP
$150
Codename
N13E-GR
GP108
Release
October 1 2012
May 23 2019
Ranking
#513
#677

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.