GeForce GTX 850A vs Radeon R7 M270

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 850A vs Radeon R7 M270 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 850A vs Radeon R7 M270: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 850A

2015

Why buy it

✅52.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 97.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.1 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R7 M270

2014

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 850A across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
100% HIGHER MSRP
$300 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 850A is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 52.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R7 M270 instead at 775 vs 767, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 850A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 850A makes the most sense to buy today. It is $150 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 97.9% (5.1 vs 2.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 850A vs Radeon R7 M270 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 850A

The GeForce GTX 850A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 993 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 767 points.

Radeon R7 M270

The Radeon R7 M270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 11 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 940 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 775 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 850A scores 767 and the Radeon R7 M270 reaches 775 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 850A is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R7 M270 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 850A) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M270). Raw compute: 1.439 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 850A) vs 0.7219 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M270). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 940 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 850A	Radeon R7 M270
G3D Mark Score	767	775+1%
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640+67%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.439 TFLOPS+99%	0.7219 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1124 MHz+20%	940 MHz
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	40+67%	24
L1 Cache	320 KB+233%	96 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 850A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 M270 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 850A	Radeon R7 M270
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 850A and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M270. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 850A) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 M270) — the GeForce GTX 850A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 850A	Radeon R7 M270
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 850A draws 75W versus the Radeon R7 M270's 75W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R7 M270 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 850A) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M270). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	GeForce GTX 850A	Radeon R7 M270
TDP	75W	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	10.2	10.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 850A came in at $150, while the Radeon R7 M270 launched at $300. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 850A was 50% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.1 (GeForce GTX 850A) vs 2.6 (Radeon R7 M270) — the GeForce GTX 850A offers 96.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 850A (2015 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce GTX 850A	Radeon R7 M270
MSRP	$150-50%	$300
Performance per Dollar	5.1+96%	2.6
Codename	GM107	Topaz
Release	March 13 2015	June 11 2014
Ranking	#621	#897

Search GeForce GTX 850A on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 M270 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.