
GeForce GTX 860M SLI vs GRID K240Q

GeForce GTX 860M SLI
Popular choices:

GRID K240Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 860M SLI is positioned at rank 280 and the GRID K240Q is on rank 210, so the GRID K240Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 860M SLI
Performance Per Dollar GRID K240Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID K240Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 860M SLI.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 860M SLI | GRID K240Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GRID K240Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 860M SLI and GRID K240Q

GeForce GTX 860M SLI
The GeForce GTX 860M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock speed is 1029 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,500 points.

GRID K240Q
The GRID K240Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,541 points. Launch price was $469.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 860M SLI scores 2,500 and the GRID K240Q reaches 2,541 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 860M SLI is built on Maxwell while the GRID K240Q uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 860M SLI) vs 1,536 (GRID K240Q).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 860M SLI | GRID K240Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,500 | 2,541+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 1536+20% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 860M SLI | GRID K240Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 860M SLI | GRID K240Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 860M SLI draws 120W versus the GRID K240Q's 225W — a 60.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 860M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 860M SLI) vs 350W (GRID K240Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 860M SLI | GRID K240Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W-47% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 20.8+84% | 11.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 860M SLI is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 860M SLI | GRID K240Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $40 |
| Codename | — | GK104 |
| Release | March 12 2014 | June 28 2013 |
| Ranking | #457 | #628 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















