GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)

#47

Radeon RX 6700S

MSRP: $479|Avg: $300

203%

#52

Radeon 8060S

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

146%

#53

Radeon RX 6850M XT

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

140%

#54

Radeon RX 6800S

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

128%

#61

GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)

MSRP: $800|Avg: $350

100%

#62

GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $350

97%

#63

RadeonT RX 6850M XT

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $600

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 57% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.

Insight	GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+57%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-57%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $350 for the GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel), it costs 79% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 197.2% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+197.2%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($350)	✅More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

League of Legends

League of Legends

No prediction data available

Valorant

Valorant

No prediction data available

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) and GeForce GTX 1650

GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)

The GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1305 MHz to 1485 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,357 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) scores 12,357 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) leads by 57%. The GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 6.843 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1485 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	12,357+57%	7,869
Architecture	Turing	Turing
Process Node	12 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	2304+157%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.843 TFLOPS+129%	2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1485 MHz	1665 MHz+12%
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	144+157%	56
L1 Cache	2.3 MB+161%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce GTX 1650 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2.0	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 250% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel). Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	448 GB/s+250%	128 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	12.2+2%	12
Vulkan	1.1	1.4+27%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	7th Gen NVENC	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) draws 115W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 42.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	115W	75W-35%
Recommended PSU	500W	300W-40%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	0mm	229mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	85°C	70°C-18%
Perf/Watt	107.5+2%	104.9

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) launched at $800 MSRP and currently averages $350, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 78.6% less ($275 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 35.3 (GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 197.2% better value.