GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

100%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

96%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

95%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

95%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

95%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

94%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

93%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

93%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

92%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

91%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

90%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

90%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

89%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

88%

#15

Radeon RX 6500 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $150

88%

#16

GeForce RTX 3070

MSRP: $499|Avg: $200

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Why is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than GeForce GTX 1650?

Comparing the GeForce GTX 1650 to the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti highlights the massive gap between entry-level and mid-range performance. The GTX 1650 is a budget-tier card based on the Turing architecture without RT or Tensor cores, meaning it lacks features like Ray Tracing and DLSS. The RTX 3060 Ti, however, is an Ampere-based powerhouse that delivers over three times the performance in most gaming titles.

Technically, the RTX 3060 Ti features 4,864 CUDA cores and 8GB of VRAM on a 256-bit bus, whereas the GTX 1650 is limited to 896 cores and 4GB of VRAM. This makes the 3060 Ti capable of smooth 1440p gaming, while the GTX 1650 struggles with even the most basic 1080p settings in modern AAA titles. The inclusion of DLSS on the 30-series card further extends its lead by allowing for AI-driven upscaling.

For any gamer looking for a modern experience, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the definitive winner. The GTX 1650 is only suitable for the most basic budget builds, eSports titles at low settings, or ultra-thin HTPC systems with strict power limits. Choosing the 3060 Ti represents a fundamental upgrade in capability, enabling high-fidelity graphics and professional-grade rendering features that the 1650 simply cannot provide.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 158.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.

Insight	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+158.1%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-158.1%)
Longevity	🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $280 for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, it costs 73% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 44.6% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+44.6%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($280)	✅More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and GeForce GTX 1650

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 158.1%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	20,312+158%	7,869
Architecture	Ampere	Turing
Process Node	8 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	4864+443%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.2 TFLOPS+443%	2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	1665 MHz
ROPs	80+150%	32
TMUs	152+171%	56
L1 Cache	4.8 MB+445%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce GTX 1650 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2.0	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 250% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	448 GB/s+250%	128 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	NVENC (Ampere)	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	NVDEC (Ampere)	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 90.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Card length: 242mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	200W	75W-63%
Recommended PSU	600W	300W-50%
Power Connector	8-pin	None
Length	242mm	229mm
Height	112mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75	70°C-7%
Perf/Watt	101.6	104.9+3%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $280, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 73.2% less ($205 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 72.5 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 44.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).