
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

RTX A4500
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs RTX A4500 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs RTX A4500 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs RTX A4500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅24.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,300 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 310% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (152 vs 224), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
RTX A4500
2021Why buy it
- ✅47.4% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (224 vs 152).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌325.8% HIGHER MSRP$1,699 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($1,699 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs RTX A4500 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX A4500
The RTX A4500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,094 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 and the RTX A4500 reaches 21,094 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the RTX A4500 uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 7,168 (RTX A4500). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 23.65 TFLOPS (RTX A4500). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1650 MHz. Ray tracing: 38 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 56 (RTX A4500) with 152 Tensor cores vs 224.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312 | 21,094+4% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864 | 7168+47% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS | 23.65 TFLOPS+46% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1650 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 96+20% |
| TMUs | 152 | 224+47% |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB | 7 MB+46% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 38 | 56+47% |
| Tensor Cores | 152 | 224+47% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A4500 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4500 carries 2 GB. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and 192-bit on the RTX A4500. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 6 MB (RTX A4500) — the RTX A4500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.1 (RTX A4500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A4500). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4500).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the RTX A4500's 200W — a 0% difference. The RTX A4500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 450W (RTX A4500). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 450W-25% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6 | 105.5+4% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti came in at $399, while the RTX A4500 launched at $1699. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3060 Ti was 76.5% cheaper ($1300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.4 (RTX A4500) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 310.5% better value. The newer card here is RTX A4500 (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-77% | $1699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+310% | 12.4 |
| Codename | GA104 | GA102 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | November 23 2021 |
| Ranking | #73 | #68 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














