GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs RTX A4500
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:
RTX A4500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Performance Per Dollar RTX A4500
Why is RTX A4500 better than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?
The battle between the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and the professional NVIDIA RTX A4500 represents a split between high-value gaming and stable workstation performance. Both are based on the Ampere architecture, but the RTX A4500 is a specialized tool for creators, while the 3060 Ti is a gaming iconic. In raw gaming benchmarks, the 3060 Ti often holds a slight edge due to its more aggressive performance tuning and consumer-focused drivers, whereas the A4500 focuses on certified accuracy and having a larger memory pool.
Technically, the RTX A4500 features a 20GB GDDR6 VRAM buffer with ECC support, which is more than double the 8GB found on the 3060 Ti. This makes the A4500 much better suited for large 3D architectural models and complex video projects that would exceed the 3060 Ti's memory limit. However, for standard 1080p and 1440p gaming, the RTX 3060 Ti is more cost-effective and provides a very similar, or sometimes superior, real-time experience.
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the winner for gamers and casual content creators who want a high-performance card at a great price. It defines the mid-range category with its excellent balance of speed and efficiency. The NVIDIA RTX A4500 is the winner for professionals who need the stability of certified drivers and the security of ECC memory for long-term render projects. For a general gaming build in 2026, the 3060 Ti remains the definitive choice, but the A4500 is a powerful workstation alternative for serious enterprise use.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A4500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.8%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (2 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $280 versus $800 for the RTX A4500, it costs 65% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 175.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+175.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($280) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($800) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and RTX A4500
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.
RTX A4500
The RTX A4500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,094 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 and the RTX A4500 reaches 21,094 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the RTX A4500 uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 7,168 (RTX A4500). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 23.65 TFLOPS (RTX A4500). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1650 MHz. Ray tracing: 38 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 56 (RTX A4500) with 152 Tensor cores vs 224.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312 | 21,094+4% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864 | 7168+47% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS | 23.65 TFLOPS+46% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1650 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 96+20% |
| TMUs | 152 | 224+47% |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB | 7 MB+46% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 38 | 56+47% |
| Tensor Cores | 152 | 224+47% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The RTX A4500 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4500 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 6 MB (RTX A4500) — the RTX A4500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.1 (RTX A4500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A4500). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4500).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the RTX A4500's 200W — a 0% difference. The RTX A4500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 450W (RTX A4500). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 450W-25% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6 | 105.5+4% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $280, while the RTX A4500 launched at $1699 and now averages $800. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 65% less ($520 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 72.5 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 26.4 (RTX A4500) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 174.6% better value. The RTX A4500 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-77% | $1699 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $280-65% | $800 |
| Performance per Dollar | 72.5+175% | 26.4 |
| Codename | GA104 | GA102 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | November 23 2021 |
| Ranking | #73 | #68 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and RTX A4500
