GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs RTX A4500

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020Core: 1410 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
NVIDIA

RTX A4500

2021Core: 1050 MHzBoost: 1650 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs RTX A4500 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs RTX A4500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs RTX A4500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

  • 24.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $1,300 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
  • Delivers 310% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (152 vs 224), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.

RTX A4500

2021

Why buy it

  • 47.4% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (224 vs 152).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • 325.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,699 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($1,699 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 24.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward RTX A4500 instead at 21,094 vs 20,312, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RTX A4500 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 56 vs 38 ray-tracing units and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2020. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,300 cheaper on MSRP at $399 vs $1,699, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 310% (50.9 vs 12.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and strong 1440p, GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and strong 1440p headroom, RTX A4500 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs RTX A4500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

NVIDIA

RTX A4500

The RTX A4500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,094 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 and the RTX A4500 reaches 21,094 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the RTX A4500 uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 7,168 (RTX A4500). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 23.65 TFLOPS (RTX A4500). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1650 MHz. Ray tracing: 38 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 56 (RTX A4500) with 152 Tensor cores vs 224.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRTX A4500
G3D Mark Score
20,312
21,094+4%
Architecture
Ampere
Ampere
Process Node
8 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
4864
7168+47%
Compute (TFLOPS)
16.2 TFLOPS
23.65 TFLOPS+46%
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
1650 MHz
ROPs
80
96+20%
TMUs
152
224+47%
L1 Cache
4.8 MB
7 MB+46%
L2 Cache
4 MB
6 MB+50%
Ray Tracing Cores
38
56+47%
Tensor Cores
152
224+47%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A4500 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRTX A4500
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4500 carries 2 GB. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and 192-bit on the RTX A4500. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 6 MB (RTX A4500) — the RTX A4500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRTX A4500
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+300%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
448 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit+33%
192-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB
6 MB+50%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.1 (RTX A4500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRTX A4500
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12.1
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A4500). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4500).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRTX A4500
Encoder
NVENC (Ampere)
7th Gen NVENC (2x)
Decoder
NVDEC (Ampere)
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the RTX A4500's 200W — a 0% difference. The RTX A4500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 450W (RTX A4500). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRTX A4500
TDP
200W
200W
Recommended PSU
600W
450W-25%
Power Connector
8-pin
8-pin
Length
242mm
267mm
Height
112mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
101.6
105.5+4%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti came in at $399, while the RTX A4500 launched at $1699. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3060 Ti was 76.5% cheaper ($1300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.4 (RTX A4500) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 310.5% better value. The newer card here is RTX A4500 (2021 vs 2020).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRTX A4500
MSRP
$399-77%
$1699
Performance per Dollar
50.9+310%
12.4
Codename
GA104
GA102
Release
December 1 2020
November 23 2021
Ranking
#73
#68

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.