
GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)

Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) vs Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) vs Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) vs Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 80W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
2019Why buy it
- ✅34.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌60% higher power demand at 80W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) vs Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)
The GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,357 points.

Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1380 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,173 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) scores 12,357 and the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design reaches 12,173 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on 4 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)) vs 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 2520 MHz vs 1380 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,357+2% | 12,173 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608+80% | 2560 |
| Boost Clock | 2520 MHz+83% | 1380 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) and 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) draws 50W versus the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design's 80W — a 46.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-38% | 80W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 247.1+62% | 152.2 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














