GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) vs Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)

2025Core: 2235 MHzBoost: 2520 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

2019Core: 780 MHzBoost: 1380 MHz
Similar parts

GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) vs Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) vs Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) vs Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)

2025

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 50W instead of 80W, a 30W reduction.
  • More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).

Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

2019

Why buy it

  • 34.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).

Trade-offs

  • GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
  • 60% higher power demand at 80W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 34.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) instead at 12,357 vs 12,173, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 12nm and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2019. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and lighter 1440p, Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) vs Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)

The GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,357 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1380 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,173 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) scores 12,357 and the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design reaches 12,173 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on 4 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)) vs 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 2520 MHz vs 1380 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
G3D Mark Score
12,357+2%
12,173
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
Turing
Process Node
4 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
4608+80%
2560
Boost Clock
2520 MHz+83%
1380 MHz

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) and 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit
256-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
DirectX
12.2
12.2
Vulkan
1.1
1.3+18%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design).

FeatureGeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
Encoder
7th Gen NVENC
7th Gen NVENC
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) draws 50W versus the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design's 80W — a 46.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
TDP
50W-38%
80W
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
80°C-6%
Perf/Watt
247.1+62%
152.2