
GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel) vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel) vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel) vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅7.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅283.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (368 vs 96).
Trade-offs
- ❌RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 368), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel) vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)
The GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1380 MHz to 1590 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,014 points.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1635 MHz to 2115 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,909 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel) scores 15,014 and the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile reaches 14,909 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel) is built on Turing while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)) vs 3,072 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 9.362 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)) vs 12.99 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 1590 MHz vs 2115 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)) vs 24 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) with 368 Tensor cores vs 96.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel) | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,014 | 14,909 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2944 | 3072+4% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.362 TFLOPS | 12.99 TFLOPS+39% |
| Boost Clock | 1590 MHz | 2115 MHz+33% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 184+92% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 2.9 MB | 3 MB+3% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB+200% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+92% | 24 |
| Tensor Cores | 368+283% | 96 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel) | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)) vs 256 GB/s (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) — a 75% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel). Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel) and 128-bit on the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel) | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+75% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel) | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)) vs NVENC (Ada) (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (Ada). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel) | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | NVENC (Ada) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (Ada) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel) draws 150W versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile's 50W — a 100% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)) vs 500W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel) | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 50W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 100.1 | 298.2+198% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel) | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000 | — |
| Codename | TU104B | AD107 |
| Release | January 29 2019 | March 21 2023 |
| Ranking | #146 | #155 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














