
GeForce RTX 2080 vs Quadro RTX 6000

GeForce RTX 2080
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX 6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 6000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 2080 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro RTX 6000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 2080 | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+203.6%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 2080 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $250 versus $1,800 for the Quadro RTX 6000, it costs 86% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 651.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 2080 | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+651.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($250) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,800) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2080 and Quadro RTX 6000

GeForce RTX 2080
The GeForce RTX 2080 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,676 points. Launch price was $699.

Quadro RTX 6000
The Quadro RTX 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,887 points. Launch price was $6,299.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2080 scores 18,676 and the Quadro RTX 6000 reaches 17,887 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2080 is built on Turing while the Quadro RTX 6000 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce RTX 2080) vs 4,608 (Quadro RTX 6000). Raw compute: 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2080) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 6000). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2080) vs 72 (Quadro RTX 6000) with 368 Tensor cores vs 576.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 18,676+4% | 17,887 |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2944 | 4608+57% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.07 TFLOPS | 16.31 TFLOPS+62% |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz | 1770 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 184 | 288+57% |
| L1 Cache | 2.9 MB | 4.5 MB+55% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 72+57% |
| Tensor Cores | 368 | 576+57% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2080 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro RTX 6000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2080 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 6000 has 24 GB. The Quadro RTX 6000 offers 203.6% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2080) vs 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 6000) — a 71.4% advantage for the Quadro RTX 6000. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2080) vs 6 MB (Quadro RTX 6000) — the Quadro RTX 6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 7.906 GB | 24 GB+204% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 768 GB/s+71% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce RTX 2080) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 6000). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2080) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 6000). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP10. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce RTX 2080) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 6000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | 4th Gen NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP10 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2080 draws 215W versus the Quadro RTX 6000's 260W — a 18.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 2080 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 2080) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 6000). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 215W-17% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 116mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 86.9+26% | 68.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2080 launched at $699 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the Quadro RTX 6000 launched at $6300 and now averages $1800. The GeForce RTX 2080 costs 86.1% less ($1550 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 74.7 (GeForce RTX 2080) vs 9.9 (Quadro RTX 6000) — the GeForce RTX 2080 offers 654.5% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699-89% | $6300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250-86% | $1800 |
| Performance per Dollar | 74.7+655% | 9.9 |
| Codename | TU104 | TU102 |
| Release | September 20 2018 | August 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #94 | #99 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














