
GeForce RTX 2080 vs Radeon RX 6700

GeForce RTX 2080
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score and 26.5% more VRAM (10 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 2080.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 2080 | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (10 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 2080 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $250 versus $300 for the Radeon RX 6700, it costs 17% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 18.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 2080 | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+18.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($250) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2080 and Radeon RX 6700

GeForce RTX 2080
The GeForce RTX 2080 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,676 points. Launch price was $699.

Radeon RX 6700
The Radeon RX 6700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1941 MHz to 2450 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,920 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2080 scores 18,676 and the Radeon RX 6700 reaches 18,920 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2080 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 6700 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce RTX 2080) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 6700). Raw compute: 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2080) vs 11.29 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 2450 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2080) vs 36 (Radeon RX 6700) with 368 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 18,676 | 18,920+1% |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2944+28% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.07 TFLOPS | 11.29 TFLOPS+12% |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz | 2450 MHz+43% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+28% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 2.9 MB+480% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+28% | 36 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6700 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 2080 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 2080 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2080 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6700 has 10 GB. The Radeon RX 6700 offers 26.5% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2080) vs 320 GB/s (Radeon RX 6700) — a 40% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2080. Bus width: 256-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2080) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6700) — the GeForce RTX 2080 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 7.906 GB | 10 GB+26% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+40% | 320 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+60% | 160-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce RTX 2080) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6700). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2080) vs VCE (Radeon RX 6700). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs UVD. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce RTX 2080) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (Radeon RX 6700).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | VCE |
| Decoder | 4th Gen NVDEC | UVD |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2080 draws 215W versus the Radeon RX 6700's 175W — a 20.5% difference. The Radeon RX 6700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 2080) vs 550W (Radeon RX 6700). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 215W | 175W-19% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 550W-15% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 116mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 86.9 | 108.1+24% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2080 launched at $699 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the Radeon RX 6700 launched at $379 and now averages $300. The GeForce RTX 2080 costs 16.7% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 74.7 (GeForce RTX 2080) vs 63.1 (Radeon RX 6700) — the GeForce RTX 2080 offers 18.4% better value. The Radeon RX 6700 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $379-46% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250-17% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 74.7+18% | 63.1 |
| Codename | TU104 | Navi 22 |
| Release | September 20 2018 | June 9 2021 |
| Ranking | #94 | #90 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














