
GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU

Radeon Pro Vega 48
GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU vs Radeon Pro Vega 48 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU vs Radeon Pro Vega 48 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU vs Radeon Pro Vega 48: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro Vega 48 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 25.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 30W.
Radeon Pro Vega 48
2019Why buy it
- ✅2.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 25.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 130W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU vs Radeon Pro Vega 48 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,240 points. Launch price was $249.

Radeon Pro Vega 48
The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,270 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU scores 11,240 and the Radeon Pro Vega 48 reaches 11,270 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro Vega 48 uses GCN 5.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU) vs 3,072 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Raw compute: 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1300 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,240 | 11,270 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3072+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.098 TFLOPS+14% | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+37% | 1300 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 192+140% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+233% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 48 carries 0 MB. GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 48. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 48) — the Radeon Pro Vega 48 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_2 (GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12.1 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 48).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU draws 130W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 48's 30W — a 125% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 30W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 1mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 86.5 | 375.7+334% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $450 |
| Codename | GA106 | Vega 10 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | March 19 2019 |
| Ranking | #211 | #241 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














