G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile vs Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile vs Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile

2024

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 45W instead of 80W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (56 vs 288), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 18.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $600 MSRP).

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

2019

Why buy it

✅7.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅414.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (288 vs 56).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌77.8% higher power demand at 80W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 7.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile instead at 11,269 vs 10,829, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, a 8nm process instead of 12nm, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2019. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile vs Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile

The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1343 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 14 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,269 points.

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 945 MHz to 1380 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,829 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile scores 11,269 and the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) reaches 10,829 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is built on Ampere while the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) vs 2,304 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 4.813 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) vs 6.359 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1343 MHz vs 1380 MHz. Ray tracing: 14 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) vs 36 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) with 56 Tensor cores vs 288.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile	Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score	11,269+4%	10,829
Architecture	Ampere	Turing
Process Node	8 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1792	2304+29%
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.813 TFLOPS	6.359 TFLOPS+32%
Boost Clock	1343 MHz	1380 MHz+3%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	56	144+157%
L1 Cache	1.8 MB	2.3 MB+28%
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%
Ray Tracing Cores	14	36+157%
Tensor Cores	56	288+414%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile	Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) carries 4 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile and 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel). L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) — the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile	Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) vs 12.1 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile	Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
DirectX	12.2	12.1
Vulkan	1.3+30%	1.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile	Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile draws 45W versus the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)'s 80W — a 56% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile	Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
TDP	45W-44%	80W
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	0mm
Height	0mm	0mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	75°C-12%	85°C
Perf/Watt	250.4+85%	135.4

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile (2024 vs 2019).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile	Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
MSRP	—	$600
Codename	GA106	TU106
Release	2024	May 27 2019
Ranking	#242	#261

Search GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile on Amazon

Search Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.