G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile

2024

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 45W instead of 80W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (56 vs 288), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 18.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $600 MSRP).

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

2019

Why buy it

✅6.3% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅414.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (288 vs 56).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌77.8% higher power demand at 80W vs 45W.

GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile

2024

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

2019

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 45W instead of 80W, a 35W reduction.

Why buy it

✅6.3% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅414.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (288 vs 56).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (56 vs 288), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 18.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $600 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌77.8% higher power demand at 80W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile better than Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) averages 6.3% more FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 11,269 vs 10,829 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, DLSS Super Resolution, plus much lower power draw (45W vs 80W).

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2019, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 4 GB, and a 8nm process instead of 12nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $600 MSRP. GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $600 MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 4.1% higher G3D Mark. Moving to an unclear MSRP gets you newer hardware, lower power draw (45W vs 80W), and DLSS Super Resolution.

Is Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below $600 MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with newer hardware and DLSS Super Resolution.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile Benchmark Check

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile	Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
1080p
low	107 FPS	93 FPS
medium	89 FPS	81 FPS
high	77 FPS	66 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	45 FPS
1440p
low	92 FPS	78 FPS
medium	76 FPS	69 FPS
high	57 FPS	51 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	34 FPS
4K
low	37 FPS	28 FPS
medium	33 FPS	27 FPS
high	21 FPS	18 FPS
ultra	18 FPS	15 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile Open Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile	Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
1080p
low	164 FPS	241 FPS
medium	141 FPS	194 FPS
high	112 FPS	159 FPS
ultra	88 FPS	133 FPS
1440p
low	120 FPS	185 FPS
medium	99 FPS	147 FPS
high	76 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	96 FPS
4K
low	72 FPS	107 FPS
medium	60 FPS	88 FPS
high	46 FPS	72 FPS
ultra	32 FPS	53 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile Open Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile	Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
1080p
low	500 FPS	455 FPS
medium	406 FPS	390 FPS
high	338 FPS	325 FPS
ultra	254 FPS	244 FPS
1440p
low	349 FPS	325 FPS
medium	297 FPS	283 FPS
high	240 FPS	244 FPS
ultra	190 FPS	183 FPS
4K
low	227 FPS	218 FPS
medium	195 FPS	182 FPS
high	145 FPS	140 FPS
ultra	106 FPS	104 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile Open Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile	Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
1080p
low	238 FPS	162 FPS
medium	208 FPS	133 FPS
high	171 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	143 FPS	95 FPS
1440p
low	184 FPS	117 FPS
medium	164 FPS	99 FPS
high	130 FPS	86 FPS
ultra	106 FPS	71 FPS
4K
low	100 FPS	71 FPS
medium	83 FPS	59 FPS
high	66 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	52 FPS	36 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile Open Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile and Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile

The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1343 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 14 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,269 points.

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 945 MHz to 1380 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,829 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile scores 11,269 and the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) reaches 10,829 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is built on Ampere while the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) vs 2,304 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 4.813 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) vs 6.359 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1343 MHz vs 1380 MHz. Ray tracing: 14 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) vs 36 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) with 56 Tensor cores vs 288.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile	Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score	11,269+4%	10,829
Architecture	Ampere	Turing
Process Node	8 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1792	2304+29%
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.813 TFLOPS	6.359 TFLOPS+32%
Boost Clock	1343 MHz	1380 MHz+3%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	56	144+157%
L1 Cache	1.8 MB	2.3 MB+28%
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%
Ray Tracing Cores	14	36+157%
Tensor Cores	56	288+414%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile	Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) — the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile	Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) vs 12.1 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile	Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
DirectX	12.2	12.1
Vulkan	1.3+30%	1.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile	Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile draws 45W versus the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)'s 80W — a 56% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile	Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
TDP	45W-44%	80W
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	0mm
Height	0mm	0mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	75°C-12%	85°C
Perf/Watt	250.4+85%	135.4