
GeForce GTX 1660
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1660
2019Why buy it
- ✅11.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 53.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 120W vs 45W.
GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile
2024Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 120W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1660 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 53.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1660
2019GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile
2024Why buy it
- ✅11.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 53.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 120W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 120W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1660 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 53.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1660 better than GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile make more sense than GeForce GTX 1660?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 101 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 32 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 524 FPS | 500 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 406 FPS |
| high | 346 FPS | 338 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 254 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 106 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 364 FPS | 238 FPS |
| medium | 301 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 251 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 216 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 296 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 52 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 and GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile

GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660
The GeForce GTX 1660 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 14 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,639 points. Launch price was $219.

GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile
The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1343 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 14 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,269 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1660 scores 11,639 and the GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile reaches 11,269 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 1,792 (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 4.813 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1343 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,639+3% | 11,269 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 1792+27% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.027 TFLOPS+4% | 4.813 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz+33% | 1343 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 88+57% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB | 1.8 MB+29% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1660 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1660 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1660. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s+50% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1660 draws 120W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile's 45W — a 90.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W | 45W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 97.0 | 250.4+158% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $219 | — |
| Codename | TU116 | GA106 |
| Release | March 14 2019 | 2024 |
| Ranking | #231 | #242 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













