GeForce GTX 1660 vs Radeon RX 7400

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1660

2019Core: 1530 MHzBoost: 1785 MHz
GTX family
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 7400

2025Core: 1452 MHzBoost: 2300 MHz
RX family
·······

GeForce GTX 1660 vs Radeon RX 7400 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1660 vs Radeon RX 7400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1660 vs Radeon RX 7400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1660

2019

Why buy it

  • Measures 229mm instead of 241mm, a 12mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7400 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • Older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 10.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $219 MSRPvs$199 MSRP

Radeon RX 7400

2025

Why buy it

  • 24.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $20 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
  • Delivers 10.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 58.6 vs 53.1 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • 33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX 7400 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 24.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (11,654 vs 11,639), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 7400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 6 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with FSR 3 (2023) and FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while GeForce GTX 1660 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 6nm process instead of 12nm, and 28 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 7400 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $20 cheaper on MSRP at $199 vs $219, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 10.2% (58.6 vs 53.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1660 vs Radeon RX 7400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1660

The GeForce GTX 1660 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 14 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,639 points. Launch price was $219.

AMD

Radeon RX 7400

The Radeon RX 7400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,654 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1660 scores 11,639 and the Radeon RX 7400 reaches 11,654 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 7400 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 7400). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7400). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 2300 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1660Radeon RX 7400
G3D Mark Score
11,639
11,654
Architecture
Turing
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
12 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
1408
1792+27%
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.027 TFLOPS
16.49 TFLOPS+228%
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
2300 MHz+29%
ROPs
48
64+33%
TMUs
88
112+27%
L1 Cache
1.4 MB+180%
0.5 MB
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
2 MB+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 7400 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX 1660 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce GTX 1660 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 7400 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1660Radeon RX 7400
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR 3
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1660 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7400 carries 8 GB. Radeon RX 7400 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 128 GB/s (Radeon RX 7400) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1660. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1660 and 64-bit on the Radeon RX 7400. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7400) — the Radeon RX 7400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1660Radeon RX 7400
VRAM Capacity
6 GB
8 GB+33%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s+50%
128 GB/s
Bus Width
192-bit+200%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
2 MB+33%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7400). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1660Radeon RX 7400
DirectX
12.1
12.2
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1660) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7400). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7400).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1660Radeon RX 7400
Encoder
7th Gen NVENC
VCN 4.0
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
VCN 4.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1660 draws 120W versus the Radeon RX 7400's 43W — a 94.5% difference. The Radeon RX 7400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 450W (Radeon RX 7400). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Card length: 229mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1660Radeon RX 7400
TDP
120W
43W-64%
Recommended PSU
450W
450W
Power Connector
8-pin
None
Length
229mm
241mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
75°C
Perf/Watt
97.0
271.0+179%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1660 came in at $219, while the Radeon RX 7400 launched at $199. On MSRP, Radeon RX 7400 was 9.1% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 53.1 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 58.6 (Radeon RX 7400) — the Radeon RX 7400 offers 10.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 7400 (2025 vs 2019).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1660Radeon RX 7400
MSRP
$219
$199-9%
Performance per Dollar
53.1
58.6+10%
Codename
TU116
Navi 33
Release
March 14 2019
August 8 2025
Ranking
#231
#229

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.