GeForce GTX 1660
VS
Arc A770M

GeForce GTX 1660 vs Arc A770M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1660

2019Core: 1530 MHzBoost: 1785 MHz
VS
Intel

Arc A770M

2022Core: 1650 MHzBoost: 2050 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Arc A770M

#22
Radeon RX 7700
MSRP: $449|Avg: $399
133%
#25
Radeon RX 7600M XT
MSRP: $329|Avg: $300
120%
#28
Radeon RX 6650M XT
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
115%
#30
Radeon 8050S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
110%
#31
Radeon RX 8050S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
109%
#35
Arc A770M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#39
Radeon RX 7700S
MSRP: $449|Avg: $350
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Arc A770M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score and 166.7% more VRAM (16 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1660.

InsightGeForce GTX 1660Arc A770M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%)
Leading raw performance (+1.8%)
Longevity
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
🔮Strong Longevity (Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) / 6nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
🎮 High Capacity (6 GB)
🎮 High Capacity (16 GB)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc A770M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 and Arc A770M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1660

The GeForce GTX 1660 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 14 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,639 points. Launch price was $219.

Intel

Arc A770M

The Arc A770M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1650 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,853 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1660 scores 11,639 and the Arc A770M reaches 11,853 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 is built on Turing while the Arc A770M uses Generation 12.7, both on 12 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 4,096 (Arc A770M). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 16.79 TFLOPS (Arc A770M). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 2050 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1660Arc A770M
G3D Mark Score
11,639
11,853+2%
Architecture
Turing
Generation 12.7
Process Node
12 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
1408
4096+191%
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.027 TFLOPS
16.79 TFLOPS+234%
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
2050 MHz+15%
ROPs
48
128+167%
TMUs
88
256+191%
L1 Cache
1.4 MB
6 MB+329%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
16 MB+967%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1660Arc A770M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
XeSS
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1660 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Arc A770M has 16 GB. The Arc A770M offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 512 GB/s (Arc A770M) — a 166.7% advantage for the Arc A770M. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 16 MB (Arc A770M) — the Arc A770M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1660Arc A770M
VRAM Capacity
6 GB
16 GB+167%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
512 GB/s+167%
Bus Width
192-bit
256-bit+33%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
16 MB+967%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 12.2 (Arc A770M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1660Arc A770M
DirectX
12.1
12.2
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1660) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc A770M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A770M).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1660Arc A770M
Encoder
7th Gen NVENC
Xe Media Engine
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
Xe Media Engine
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1660 draws 120W versus the Arc A770M's 120W — a 0% difference. The Arc A770M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 500W (Arc A770M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1660Arc A770M
TDP
120W
120W
Recommended PSU
450W-10%
500W
Power Connector
8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75°C-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
97.0
98.8+2%
💰

Value Analysis

The Arc A770M is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1660Arc A770M
MSRP
$219
Avg Price (30d)
$180
Codename
TU116
DG2-512
Release
March 14 2019
2022
Ranking
#231
#225