GeForce GTX 1660
VS
Radeon Pro 5700

GeForce GTX 1660 vs Radeon Pro 5700

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1660

2019Core: 1530 MHzBoost: 1785 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro 5700

2020Core: 1243 MHzBoost: 1350 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 5700

#41
Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
126%
#42
Radeon Pro W5700
MSRP: $799|Avg: $300
125%
#43
Radeon Pro W5700X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $999
123%
#44
RTX A4000
MSRP: $1111|Avg: $1111
122%
#45
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
MSRP: $849|Avg: $748
118%
#46
Quadro RTX 4000
MSRP: $899|Avg: $220
116%
#49
RTX 2000E Ada Generation
MSRP: $999|Avg: $999
106%
#50
105%
#51
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $2015
103%
#52
RTX A1000
MSRP: $749|Avg: $500
101%
#54
Radeon Pro 5700
MSRP: $799|Avg: $250
100%
#55
Quadro P4000
MSRP: $815|Avg: $290
98%
#57
Quadro RTX 3000
MSRP: $800|Avg: $891
95%
#58
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1700
92%
#59
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
MSRP: $999|Avg: $150
89%
#60
Radeon Pro WX 8200
MSRP: $999|Avg: $350
88%
#62
RTX A4500
MSRP: $1699|Avg: $800
87%
#63
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
MSRP: $2250|Avg: $2000
86%
#64
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1547
84%
#65
RTX A4000H
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $927
82%
#66
Radeon PRO W7800
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
76%
#67
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450
72%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1660 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro 5700 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GTX 1660Radeon Pro 5700
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.5%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%)
Longevity
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) / 7nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
🎮 High Capacity (6 GB)
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1660 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $180 versus $250 for the Radeon Pro 5700, it costs 28% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 40.9% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GTX 1660Radeon Pro 5700
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+40.9%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($180)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 and Radeon Pro 5700

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1660

The GeForce GTX 1660 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 14 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,639 points. Launch price was $219.

AMD

Radeon Pro 5700

The Radeon Pro 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,469 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1660 scores 11,639 and the Radeon Pro 5700 reaches 11,469 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro 5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro 5700). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 6.221 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1350 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1660Radeon Pro 5700
G3D Mark Score
11,639+1%
11,469
Architecture
Turing
RDNA 1.0
Process Node
12 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
1408
2304+64%
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.027 TFLOPS
6.221 TFLOPS+24%
Boost Clock
1785 MHz+32%
1350 MHz
ROPs
48
64+33%
TMUs
88
144+64%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
4 MB+167%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1660Radeon Pro 5700
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1660 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5700 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro 5700 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700) — the Radeon Pro 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1660Radeon Pro 5700
VRAM Capacity
6 GB
8 GB+33%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
192-bit+50%
128-bit
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
4 MB+167%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1660Radeon Pro 5700
DirectX
12.1
12.1
Vulkan
1.3
1.4+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
6+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1660) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5700). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5700).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1660Radeon Pro 5700
Encoder
7th Gen NVENC
VCN 2.0
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
VCN 2.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
H.264,H.265
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1660 draws 120W versus the Radeon Pro 5700's 130W — a 8% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5700). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1660Radeon Pro 5700
TDP
120W-8%
130W
Recommended PSU
450W-10%
500W
Power Connector
8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
267mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75°C-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
97.0+10%
88.2
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1660 launched at $219 MSRP and currently averages $180, while the Radeon Pro 5700 launched at $799 and now averages $250. The GeForce GTX 1660 costs 28% less ($70 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 64.7 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 45.9 (Radeon Pro 5700) — the GeForce GTX 1660 offers 41% better value. The Radeon Pro 5700 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1660Radeon Pro 5700
MSRP
$219-73%
$799
Avg Price (30d)
$180-28%
$250
Performance per Dollar
64.7+41%
45.9
Codename
TU116
Navi 10
Release
March 14 2019
August 4 2020
Ranking
#231
#238