Arc A770M
VS
GeForce GTX 1660

Arc A770M vs GeForce GTX 1660

Intel

Arc A770M

2022Core: 1650 MHzBoost: 2050 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1660

2019Core: 1530 MHzBoost: 1785 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Arc A770M

#22
Radeon RX 7700
MSRP: $449|Avg: $399
133%
#25
Radeon RX 7600M XT
MSRP: $329|Avg: $300
120%
#28
Radeon RX 6650M XT
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
115%
#30
Radeon 8050S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
110%
#31
Radeon RX 8050S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
109%
#35
Arc A770M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#39
Radeon RX 7700S
MSRP: $449|Avg: $350
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Arc A770M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score and 166.7% more VRAM (16 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1660.

InsightArc A770MGeForce GTX 1660
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.8%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%)
Longevity
🔮Strong Longevity (Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) / 6nm)
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
🎮 High Capacity (16 GB)
🎮 High Capacity (6 GB)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc A770M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc A770M and GeForce GTX 1660

Intel

Arc A770M

The Arc A770M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1650 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,853 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1660

The GeForce GTX 1660 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 14 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,639 points. Launch price was $219.

Graphics Performance

The Arc A770M scores 11,853 and the GeForce GTX 1660 reaches 11,639 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A770M is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX 1660 uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770M) vs 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660). Raw compute: 16.79 TFLOPS (Arc A770M) vs 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1785 MHz.

FeatureArc A770MGeForce GTX 1660
G3D Mark Score
11,853+2%
11,639
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Turing
Process Node
6 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
4096+191%
1408
Compute (TFLOPS)
16.79 TFLOPS+234%
5.027 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2050 MHz+15%
1785 MHz
ROPs
128+167%
48
TMUs
256+191%
88
L1 Cache
6 MB+329%
1.4 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB+967%
1.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureArc A770MGeForce GTX 1660
Upscaling Tech
XeSS
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A770M comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1660 has 6 GB. The Arc A770M offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A770M) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660) — a 166.7% advantage for the Arc A770M. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770M) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660) — the Arc A770M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureArc A770MGeForce GTX 1660
VRAM Capacity
16 GB+167%
6 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s+167%
192 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit+33%
192-bit
L2 Cache
16 MB+967%
1.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc A770M) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1660). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureArc A770MGeForce GTX 1660
DirectX
12.2
12.1
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A770M) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1660). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A770M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660).

FeatureArc A770MGeForce GTX 1660
Encoder
Xe Media Engine
7th Gen NVENC
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A770M draws 120W versus the GeForce GTX 1660's 120W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A770M) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 1660). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

FeatureArc A770MGeForce GTX 1660
TDP
120W
120W
Recommended PSU
500W
450W-10%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
8-pin
Length
0mm
229mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
75°C-6%
Perf/Watt
98.8+2%
97.0
💰

Value Analysis

The Arc A770M is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).

FeatureArc A770MGeForce GTX 1660
MSRP
$219
Avg Price (30d)
$180
Codename
DG2-512
TU116
Release
2022
March 14 2019
Ranking
#225
#231