Arc A770M vs Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)

Arc A770M vs Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) Performance Spectrum

Arc A770M

16 GB 120

11,853

+1.2%

Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)

8 GB 40

11,715

0.0%

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

GeForce GTX TITAN Z

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A770M vs Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A770M vs Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A770M

2022

Why buy it

✅117.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌200% higher power demand at 120W vs 40W.

Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)

2021

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅Draws 40W instead of 120W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A770M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Arc A770M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 117.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.2% in PassMark G3D (11,853 vs 11,715), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A770M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 16 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM, a 6nm process instead of 12nm, 32 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2021. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Arc A770M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Arc A770M vs Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A770M

The Arc A770M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1650 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,853 points.

Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)

The Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1410 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,715 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A770M scores 11,853 and the Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) reaches 11,715 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A770M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770M) vs 896 (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)). Raw compute: 16.79 TFLOPS (Arc A770M) vs 2.527 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1410 MHz.

Feature	Arc A770M	Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
G3D Mark Score	11,853+1%	11,715
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Turing
Process Node	6 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	4096+357%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.79 TFLOPS+564%	2.527 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2050 MHz+45%	1410 MHz
ROPs	128+300%	32
TMUs	256+357%	56
L1 Cache	6 MB+582%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	16 MB+1500%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Arc A770M does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A770M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	Arc A770M	Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A770M has 16 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) carries 8 GB. Arc A770M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Arc A770M and 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile). L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770M) vs 1 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)) — the Arc A770M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A770M	Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
VRAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	16 MB+1500%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc A770M) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A770M	Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A770M) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A770M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)).

Feature	Arc A770M	Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A770M draws 120W versus the Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)'s 40W — a 100% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A770M) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Arc A770M	Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
TDP	120W	40W-67%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	0mm
Height	0mm	0mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	80°C-6%	85°C
Perf/Watt	98.8	292.9+196%