Arc A770M vs Radeon PRO V710

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A770M vs Radeon PRO V710 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A770M vs Radeon PRO V710: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A770M

2022

Why buy it

✅17.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
✅Draws 120W instead of 158W, a 38W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Radeon PRO V710 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).

Radeon PRO V710

2024

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A770M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌31.7% higher power demand at 158W vs 120W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Arc A770M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 17.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon PRO V710 instead at 12,000 vs 11,853, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO V710 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 5nm process instead of 6nm, 54 vs 32 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2022. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon PRO V710 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Arc A770M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Arc A770M vs Radeon PRO V710 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A770M

The Arc A770M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1650 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,853 points.

Radeon PRO V710

The Radeon PRO V710 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 3 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3456 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 54 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,000 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A770M scores 11,853 and the Radeon PRO V710 reaches 12,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A770M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon PRO V710 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 6 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770M) vs 3,456 (Radeon PRO V710). Raw compute: 16.79 TFLOPS (Arc A770M) vs 27.65 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO V710). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 2000 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Arc A770M) vs 54 (Radeon PRO V710) with 512 Tensor cores.

Feature	Arc A770M	Radeon PRO V710
G3D Mark Score	11,853	12,000+1%
Architecture	Generation 12.7	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	6 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	4096+19%	3456
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.79 TFLOPS	27.65 TFLOPS+65%
Boost Clock	2050 MHz+3%	2000 MHz
ROPs	128+33%	96
TMUs	256+19%	216
L1 Cache	6 MB+700%	0.75 MB
L2 Cache	16 MB+700%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	32	54+69%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A770M	Radeon PRO V710
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A770M has 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO V710 carries 8 GB. Arc A770M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Arc A770M and 256-bit on the Radeon PRO V710. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770M) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO V710) — the Arc A770M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A770M	Radeon PRO V710
VRAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	16 MB+700%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc A770M) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	Arc A770M	Radeon PRO V710
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A770M) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A770M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710).

Feature	Arc A770M	Radeon PRO V710
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	VCN 4.0
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A770M draws 120W versus the Radeon PRO V710's 158W — a 27.3% difference. The Arc A770M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A770M) vs 500W (Radeon PRO V710). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Arc A770M	Radeon PRO V710
TDP	120W-24%	158W
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	267mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	98.8+30%	75.9

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon PRO V710 (2024 vs 2022).

Feature	Arc A770M	Radeon PRO V710
MSRP	—	$2000
Codename	DG2-512	Navi 32
Release	2022	October 3 2024
Ranking	#225	#196

Search Arc A770M on Amazon

Search Radeon PRO V710 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.