Arc A770M vs RTX A4000H
Arc A770M
Popular choices:
RTX A4000H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc A770M
Performance Per Dollar RTX A4000H
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc A770M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (16 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX A4000H.
| Insight | Arc A770M | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) / 6nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc A770M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A770M and RTX A4000H
Arc A770M
The Arc A770M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1650 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,853 points.
RTX A4000H
The RTX A4000H is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,815 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A770M scores 11,853 and the RTX A4000H reaches 11,815 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A770M is built on Generation 12.7 while the RTX A4000H uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770M) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000H). Raw compute: 16.79 TFLOPS (Arc A770M) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000H). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Arc A770M) vs 48 (RTX A4000H) with 512 Tensor cores vs 192.
| Feature | Arc A770M | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,853 | 11,815 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 | 6144+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.79 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS+14% |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz+31% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 128+33% | 96 |
| TMUs | 256+33% | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+300% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 32 | 48+50% |
| Tensor Cores | 512+167% | 192 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A770M | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A770M comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4000H has 8 GB. The Arc A770M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A770M) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4000H) — a 14.3% advantage for the Arc A770M. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770M) vs 4 MB (RTX A4000H) — the Arc A770M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A770M | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+14% | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+300% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc A770M) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000H). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A770M | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A770M) vs None (RTX A4000H). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs None. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A770M) vs None (RTX A4000H).
| Feature | Arc A770M | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | None |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | None |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | None |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A770M draws 120W versus the RTX A4000H's 140W — a 15.4% difference. The Arc A770M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A770M) vs 500W (RTX A4000H). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Arc A770M | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W-14% | 140W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 98.8+17% | 84.4 |
Value Analysis
The Arc A770M is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | Arc A770M | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $1000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $927 |
| Codename | DG2-512 | GA104 |
| Release | 2022 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #225 | #226 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A770M and RTX A4000H
