Arc A770M vs RTX A4000H

Intel

Arc A770M

2022Core: 1650 MHzBoost: 2050 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

RTX A4000H

2021Core: 735 MHzBoost: 1560 MHz

Arc A770M vs RTX A4000H Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A770M vs RTX A4000H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A770M vs RTX A4000H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A770M

2022

Why buy it

  • 18.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
  • Draws 120W instead of 140W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).

RTX A4000H

2021

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Arc A770M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 16.7% higher power demand at 140W vs 120W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Arc A770M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 18.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (11,853 vs 11,815), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Arc A770M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 16 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM, a 6nm process instead of 8nm, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2021. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RTX A4000H makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, RTX A4000H is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Arc A770M has the stronger long-term case.

Arc A770M vs RTX A4000H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc A770M

The Arc A770M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1650 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,853 points.

NVIDIA

RTX A4000H

The RTX A4000H is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,815 points.

Graphics Performance

The Arc A770M scores 11,853 and the RTX A4000H reaches 11,815 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A770M is built on Generation 12.7 while the RTX A4000H uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770M) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000H). Raw compute: 16.79 TFLOPS (Arc A770M) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000H). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Arc A770M) vs 48 (RTX A4000H) with 512 Tensor cores vs 192.

FeatureArc A770MRTX A4000H
G3D Mark Score
11,853
11,815
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Ampere
Process Node
6 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
4096
6144+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)
16.79 TFLOPS
19.17 TFLOPS+14%
Boost Clock
2050 MHz+31%
1560 MHz
ROPs
128+33%
96
TMUs
256+33%
192
L1 Cache
6 MB
6 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB+300%
4 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
32
48+50%
Tensor Cores
512+167%
192

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A4000H gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A770M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureArc A770MRTX A4000H
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A770M has 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4000H carries 8 GB. Arc A770M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A770M) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4000H) — a 14.3% advantage for the Arc A770M. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Arc A770M and 192-bit on the RTX A4000H. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770M) vs 4 MB (RTX A4000H) — the Arc A770M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureArc A770MRTX A4000H
VRAM Capacity
16 GB+100%
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s+14%
448 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit+33%
192-bit
L2 Cache
16 MB+300%
4 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc A770M) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000H). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureArc A770MRTX A4000H
DirectX
12.2
12.2
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A770M) vs None (RTX A4000H). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs None. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A770M) vs None (RTX A4000H).

FeatureArc A770MRTX A4000H
Encoder
Xe Media Engine
None
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
None
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
None
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A770M draws 120W versus the RTX A4000H's 140W — a 15.4% difference. The Arc A770M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A770M) vs 500W (RTX A4000H). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

FeatureArc A770MRTX A4000H
TDP
120W-14%
140W
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
241mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
80°C
75°C-6%
Perf/Watt
98.8+17%
84.4
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Arc A770M (2022 vs 2021).

FeatureArc A770MRTX A4000H
MSRP
$1000
Codename
DG2-512
GA104
Release
2022
April 12 2021
Ranking
#225
#226

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.