Arc A770M vs Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A770M vs Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A770M vs Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A770M

2022

Why buy it

✅45.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 120W instead of 300W, a 180W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU

2018

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A770M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌150% higher power demand at 300W vs 120W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Arc A770M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 45.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU instead at 12,258 vs 11,853, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A770M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 16 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM, a 6nm process instead of 14nm, 32 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2018. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Arc A770M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Arc A770M vs Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A770M

The Arc A770M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1650 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,853 points.

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU

The Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,258 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A770M scores 11,853 and the Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU reaches 12,258 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A770M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770M) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU). Raw compute: 16.79 TFLOPS (Arc A770M) vs 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1500 MHz.

Feature	Arc A770M	Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
G3D Mark Score	11,853	12,258+3%
Architecture	Generation 12.7	GCN 5.0
Process Node	6 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	4096+14%	3584 ×2
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.79 TFLOPS+56%	10.75 TFLOPS ×2
Boost Clock	2050 MHz+37%	1500 MHz
ROPs	128+100%	64 ×2
TMUs	256+14%	224 ×2
L1 Cache	6 MB+582%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	16 MB+300%	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A770M	Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A770M has 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU carries 8 GB. Arc A770M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Arc A770M and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770M) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) — the Arc A770M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A770M	Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
VRAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	16 MB+300%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc A770M) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	Arc A770M	Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
DirectX	12.2	12.1
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A770M) vs VCE 4.1 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 7.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A770M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU).

Feature	Arc A770M	Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	VCE 4.1
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	UVD 7.2
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A770M draws 120W versus the Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU's 300W — a 85.7% difference. The Arc A770M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A770M) vs 500W (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Arc A770M	Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
TDP	120W-60%	300W
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	267mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	98.8+142%	40.9