Arc A770M vs GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Arc A770M vs GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Performance Spectrum

Arc A770M

16 GB 120

11,853

0.0%

11,892

+0.3%

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

GeForce GTX 780

GeForce GTX TITAN Black

GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)

GeForce GTX 1080

TITAN Xp

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A770M vs GeForce RTX 3050 OEM FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A770M vs GeForce RTX 3050 OEM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A770M

2022

Why buy it

✅57.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A770M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Arc A770M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 57.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce RTX 3050 OEM instead at 11,892 vs 11,853, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Arc A770M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Arc A770M vs GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A770M

The Arc A770M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1650 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,853 points.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A770M scores 11,853 and the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM reaches 11,892 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A770M is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770M) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 16.79 TFLOPS (Arc A770M) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1755 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Arc A770M) vs 20 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) with 512 Tensor cores vs 80.

Feature	Arc A770M	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
G3D Mark Score	11,853	11,892
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Ampere
Process Node	6 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	4096+60%	2560
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.79 TFLOPS+87%	8.986 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2050 MHz+17%	1755 MHz
ROPs	128+300%	32
TMUs	256+220%	80
L1 Cache	6 MB+140%	2.5 MB
L2 Cache	16 MB+700%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	32+60%	20
Tensor Cores	512+540%	80

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A770M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	Arc A770M	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A770M has 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM carries 8 GB. Arc A770M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A770M) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — a 128.6% advantage for the Arc A770M. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Arc A770M and 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770M) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the Arc A770M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A770M	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
VRAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	512 GB/s+129%	224 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	16 MB+700%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc A770M) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A770M	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A770M) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A770M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).

Feature	Arc A770M	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	8th Gen NVENC
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A770M draws 120W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 8% difference. The Arc A770M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A770M) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 235mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Arc A770M	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
TDP	120W-8%	130W
Recommended PSU	500W	450W-10%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	8-pin
Length	0mm	235mm
Height	0mm	124mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	75°C-6%
Perf/Watt	98.8+8%	91.5