
Arc A770M vs Radeon Pro Vega 56

Arc A770M
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro Vega 56
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc A770M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro Vega 56
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc A770M uses modern memory architecture. The Arc A770M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Arc A770M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Arc A770M | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) / 6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro Vega 56 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A770M and Radeon Pro Vega 56

Arc A770M
The Arc A770M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1650 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,853 points.

Radeon Pro Vega 56
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1138 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,104 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A770M scores 11,853 and the Radeon Pro Vega 56 reaches 12,104 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A770M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon Pro Vega 56 uses GCN 5.0, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770M) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Raw compute: 16.79 TFLOPS (Arc A770M) vs 8.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1250 MHz.
| Feature | Arc A770M | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,853 | 12,104+2% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+14% | 3584 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.79 TFLOPS+87% | 8.96 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz+64% | 1250 MHz |
| ROPs | 128+100% | 64 |
| TMUs | 256+14% | 224 |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB+582% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+300% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A770M | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A770M comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 56 has 0 MB. The Arc A770M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770M) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 56) — the Arc A770M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A770M | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+300% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc A770M) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A770M | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A770M) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A770M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 56).
| Feature | Arc A770M | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A770M draws 120W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 56's 210W — a 54.5% difference. The Arc A770M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A770M) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Arc A770M | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W-43% | 210W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 98.8+72% | 57.6 |
Value Analysis
The Arc A770M is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2017).
| Feature | Arc A770M | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $60 |
| Codename | DG2-512 | Vega 10 |
| Release | 2022 | August 14 2017 |
| Ranking | #225 | #222 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















