Arc A770M vs Radeon Pro Vega 56

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A770M vs Radeon Pro Vega 56 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A770M vs Radeon Pro Vega 56: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A770M

2022

Why buy it

✅83.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs Unknown).
✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 120W instead of 210W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 30.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Radeon Pro Vega 56

2017

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A770M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌75% higher power demand at 210W vs 120W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Arc A770M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 83.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon Pro Vega 56 instead at 12,104 vs 11,853, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A770M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 16 GB vs Unknown of VRAM, a 6nm process instead of 14nm, 32 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2017. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro Vega 56 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and lighter 1440p, Radeon Pro Vega 56 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Arc A770M has the stronger long-term case.

Arc A770M vs Radeon Pro Vega 56 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A770M

The Arc A770M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1650 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,853 points.

Radeon Pro Vega 56

The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1138 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,104 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A770M scores 11,853 and the Radeon Pro Vega 56 reaches 12,104 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A770M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon Pro Vega 56 uses GCN 5.0, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770M) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Raw compute: 16.79 TFLOPS (Arc A770M) vs 8.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1250 MHz.

Feature	Arc A770M	Radeon Pro Vega 56
G3D Mark Score	11,853	12,104+2%
Architecture	Generation 12.7	GCN 5.0
Process Node	6 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	4096+14%	3584
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.79 TFLOPS+87%	8.96 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2050 MHz+64%	1250 MHz
ROPs	128+100%	64
TMUs	256+14%	224
L1 Cache	6 MB+582%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	16 MB+300%	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A770M	Radeon Pro Vega 56
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A770M has 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 56 carries 0 MB. Arc A770M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Arc A770M and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 56. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770M) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 56) — the Arc A770M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A770M	Radeon Pro Vega 56
VRAM Capacity	16 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	16 MB+300%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc A770M) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A770M	Radeon Pro Vega 56
DirectX	12.2	12.1
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A770M) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A770M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 56).

Feature	Arc A770M	Radeon Pro Vega 56
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	VCE 4.0
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	UVD 7.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A770M draws 120W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 56's 210W — a 54.5% difference. The Arc A770M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A770M) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Arc A770M	Radeon Pro Vega 56
TDP	120W-43%	210W
Recommended PSU	500W	1W-100%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Integrated
Length	0mm	267mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C-6%	85°C
Perf/Watt	98.8+72%	57.6

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Arc A770M (2022 vs 2017).

Feature	Arc A770M	Radeon Pro Vega 56
MSRP	—	$399
Codename	DG2-512	Vega 10
Release	2022	August 14 2017
Ranking	#225	#222

Search Arc A770M on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro Vega 56 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.