Arc A770M vs Arc Pro B50

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Arc A770M

#22

Radeon RX 7700

MSRP: $449|Avg: $399

133%

#25

Radeon RX 7600M XT

MSRP: $329|Avg: $300

120%

#28

Radeon RX 6650M XT

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

115%

#30

Radeon 8050S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

110%

#31

Radeon RX 8050S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

109%

#35

Arc A770M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#39

Radeon RX 7700S

MSRP: $449|Avg: $350

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Intel Arc Pro B50

#9

Intel Arc Pro B50

MSRP: $349|Avg: $349

100%

#11

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

MSRP: $900|Avg: $300

95%

#16

Radeon PRO W7500

MSRP: $429|Avg: $401

89%

#18

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $340

88%

#19

RTX A2000 12GB

MSRP: $449|Avg: $380

87%

#20

Radeon Pro Vega 56

MSRP: $399|Avg: $60

87%

#21

RTX A2000

MSRP: $450|Avg: $320

86%

#23

Intel Arc Pro B60

MSRP: $500|Avg: $450

79%

#24

Radeon PRO W7600

MSRP: $599|Avg: $599

78%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Intel Arc Pro B50 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Arc A770M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Arc A770M	Intel Arc Pro B50
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+3%)
Longevity	🔮Strong Longevity (Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) / 6nm)	🔮Strong Longevity (Xe2 (2024) / 5nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	🎮 High Capacity (16 GB)	🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel Arc Pro B50 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc A770M Benchmark Check

Intel Arc Pro B50 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc A770M and Intel Arc Pro B50

Arc A770M

The Arc A770M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1650 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,853 points.

Intel Arc Pro B50

The Intel Arc Pro B50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,208 points. Launch price was $349.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A770M scores 11,853 and the Intel Arc Pro B50 reaches 12,208 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A770M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Intel Arc Pro B50 uses Xe2, both on 6 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770M) vs 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro B50). Raw compute: 16.79 TFLOPS (Arc A770M) vs 10.65 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B50). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 2600 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Arc A770M) vs 16 (Intel Arc Pro B50) with 512 Tensor cores.

Feature	Arc A770M	Intel Arc Pro B50
G3D Mark Score	11,853	12,208+3%
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Xe2
Process Node	6 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	4096+100%	2048
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.79 TFLOPS+58%	10.65 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2050 MHz	2600 MHz+27%
ROPs	128+700%	16
TMUs	256+100%	128
L2 Cache	16 MB+300%	4 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	32+100%	16

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A770M	Intel Arc Pro B50
Upscaling Tech	XeSS	XeSS
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A770M comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Intel Arc Pro B50 has 8 GB. The Arc A770M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770M) vs 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B50) — the Arc A770M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A770M	Intel Arc Pro B50
VRAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	16 MB+300%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc A770M) vs 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro B50). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A770M	Intel Arc Pro B50
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A770M) vs Dual Arc Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro B50). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs Dual Arc Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A770M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro B50).

Feature	Arc A770M	Intel Arc Pro B50
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	Dual Arc Media Engine
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	Dual Arc Media Engine
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A770M draws 120W versus the Intel Arc Pro B50's 70W — a 52.6% difference. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A770M) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro B50). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 167mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Arc A770M	Intel Arc Pro B50
TDP	120W	70W-42%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	167mm
Height	0mm	69mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	75°C-6%
Perf/Watt	98.8	174.4+77%