G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A770M vs Intel Arc Pro B50 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A770M vs Intel Arc Pro B50: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A770M

2022

Why buy it

✅79.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Intel Arc Pro B50 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 35.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
❌71.4% higher power demand at 120W vs 70W.

Intel Arc Pro B50

2025

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 70W instead of 120W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A770M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Arc A770M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 79.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Intel Arc Pro B50 instead at 12,208 vs 11,853, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Intel Arc Pro B50 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 6nm and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2022. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Intel Arc Pro B50 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Arc A770M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Arc A770M vs Intel Arc Pro B50 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A770M

The Arc A770M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1650 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,853 points.

Intel Arc Pro B50

The Intel Arc Pro B50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,208 points. Launch price was $349.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A770M scores 11,853 and the Intel Arc Pro B50 reaches 12,208 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A770M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Intel Arc Pro B50 uses Xe2, both on 6 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770M) vs 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro B50). Raw compute: 16.79 TFLOPS (Arc A770M) vs 10.65 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B50). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 2600 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Arc A770M) vs 16 (Intel Arc Pro B50) with 512 Tensor cores.

Feature	Arc A770M	Intel Arc Pro B50
G3D Mark Score	11,853	12,208+3%
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Xe2
Process Node	6 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	4096+100%	2048
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.79 TFLOPS+58%	10.65 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2050 MHz	2600 MHz+27%
ROPs	128+700%	16
TMUs	256+100%	128
L2 Cache	16 MB+300%	4 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	32+100%	16

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A770M	Intel Arc Pro B50
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A770M has 16 GB of VRAM, while the Intel Arc Pro B50 carries 8 GB. Arc A770M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Arc A770M and 128-bit on the Intel Arc Pro B50. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770M) vs 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B50) — the Arc A770M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A770M	Intel Arc Pro B50
VRAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	16 MB+300%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc A770M) vs 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro B50). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A770M	Intel Arc Pro B50
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A770M) vs Dual Arc Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro B50). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs Dual Arc Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A770M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro B50).

Feature	Arc A770M	Intel Arc Pro B50
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	Dual Arc Media Engine
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	Dual Arc Media Engine
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A770M draws 120W versus the Intel Arc Pro B50's 70W — a 52.6% difference. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A770M) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro B50). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 167mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Arc A770M	Intel Arc Pro B50
TDP	120W	70W-42%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	167mm
Height	0mm	69mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	75°C-6%
Perf/Watt	98.8	174.4+77%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Intel Arc Pro B50 (2025 vs 2022).

Feature	Arc A770M	Intel Arc Pro B50
MSRP	—	$349
Codename	DG2-512	BMG-G21
Release	2022	September 5 2025
Ranking	#225	#221

Search Arc A770M on Amazon

Search Intel Arc Pro B50 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.