
GeForce GTX 1660

Radeon PRO V710
GeForce GTX 1660 vs Radeon PRO V710 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1660 vs Radeon PRO V710 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1660 vs Radeon PRO V710: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1660
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,781 less on MSRP ($219 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 785.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 53.1 vs 6.0 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 158W, a 38W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO V710 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Radeon PRO V710
2024Why buy it
- ✅49.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌813.2% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$219 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 53.1 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
- ❌31.7% higher power demand at 158W vs 120W.
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1660 vs Radeon PRO V710 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1660
The GeForce GTX 1660 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 14 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,639 points. Launch price was $219.

Radeon PRO V710
The Radeon PRO V710 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 3 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3456 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 54 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1660 scores 11,639 and the Radeon PRO V710 reaches 12,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 is built on Turing while the Radeon PRO V710 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 3,456 (Radeon PRO V710). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 27.65 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO V710). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 2000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,639 | 12,000+3% |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 3456+145% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.027 TFLOPS | 27.65 TFLOPS+450% |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz | 2000 MHz+12% |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 88 | 216+145% |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB+87% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1660 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO V710 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1660 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO V710 carries 8 GB. Radeon PRO V710 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1660 and 256-bit on the Radeon PRO V710. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO V710) — the Radeon PRO V710 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1660) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1660 draws 120W versus the Radeon PRO V710's 158W — a 27.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 500W (Radeon PRO V710). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W-24% | 158W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 97.0+28% | 75.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1660 came in at $219, while the Radeon PRO V710 launched at $2000. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1660 was 89% cheaper ($1781 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 53.1 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 6.0 (Radeon PRO V710) — the GeForce GTX 1660 offers 785% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO V710 (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $219-89% | $2000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.1+785% | 6.0 |
| Codename | TU116 | Navi 32 |
| Release | March 14 2019 | October 3 2024 |
| Ranking | #231 | #196 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















