G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1660 vs Quadro P5200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1660 vs Quadro P5200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1660

2019

Why buy it

✅0.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $281 less on MSRP ($219 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 128.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 53.1 vs 23.3 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌20% higher power demand at 120W vs 100W.

Quadro P5200

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 100W instead of 120W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1660 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌
128.3% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$219 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.3 vs 53.1 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1660 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 0.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro P5200 instead at 11,650 vs 11,639, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1660 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 16nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2018. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1660 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $281 cheaper on MSRP at $219 vs $500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 128.1% (53.1 vs 23.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1660 vs Quadro P5200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1660

The GeForce GTX 1660 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 14 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,639 points. Launch price was $219.

Quadro P5200

The Quadro P5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1556 MHz to 1746 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,650 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1660 scores 11,639 and the Quadro P5200 reaches 11,650 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 is built on Turing while the Quadro P5200 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 2,560 (Quadro P5200). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 8.94 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1746 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660	Quadro P5200
G3D Mark Score	11,639	11,650
Architecture	Turing	Pascal
Process Node	12 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	1408	2560+82%
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.027 TFLOPS	8.94 TFLOPS+78%
Boost Clock	1785 MHz+2%	1746 MHz
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	88	160+82%
L1 Cache	1.4 MB+49%	0.94 MB
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	2 MB+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1660 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P5200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660	Quadro P5200
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1660 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5200 carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 1660 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1660 and 256-bit on the Quadro P5200. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 2 MB (Quadro P5200) — the Quadro P5200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660	Quadro P5200
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	2 MB+33%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660	Quadro P5200
DirectX	12.1	12.1
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1660) vs NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP7. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660	Quadro P5200
Encoder	7th Gen NVENC	NVENC 5.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	PureVideo HD VP7
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1660 draws 120W versus the Quadro P5200's 100W — a 18.2% difference. The Quadro P5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 500W (Quadro P5200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660	Quadro P5200
TDP	120W	100W-17%
Recommended PSU	450W-10%	500W
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C-12%	85°C
Perf/Watt	97.0	116.5+20%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1660 came in at $219, while the Quadro P5200 launched at $500. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1660 was 56.2% cheaper ($281 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 53.1 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 23.3 (Quadro P5200) — the GeForce GTX 1660 offers 127.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1660 (2019 vs 2018).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660	Quadro P5200
MSRP	$219-56%	$500
Performance per Dollar	53.1+128%	23.3
Codename	TU116	GP104
Release	March 14 2019	February 21 2018
Ranking	#231	#230

Search GeForce GTX 1660 on Amazon

Search Quadro P5200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.