Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 1660 vs Quadro M6000 24GB

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1660

2019Core: 1530 MHzBoost: 1785 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro M6000 24GB

2016Core: 988 MHzBoost: 1114 MHz
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 1660 vs Quadro M6000 24GB Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 1660
6 GB 120
11,639
+0.1%
brand logoGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
brand logoGeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
brand logoGeForce GTX TITAN Z
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080 Ti
brand logoRTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
brand logoGeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
Quadro M6000 24GB
24 GB 250
11,625
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
brand logoGeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
brand logoGeForce GTX TITAN Z
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
brand logoRTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080 Ti
brand logoRTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
brand logoGeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1660 vs Quadro M6000 24GB FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
GeForce GTX 1660
low101 FPS
medium89 FPS
high78 FPS
ultra64 FPS
1080P
Quadro M6000 24GB
low160 FPS
medium142 FPS
high119 FPS
ultra86 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
GeForce GTX 1660
low197 FPS
medium168 FPS
high138 FPS
ultra99 FPS
1080P
Quadro M6000 24GB
low191 FPS
medium168 FPS
high136 FPS
ultra105 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
GeForce GTX 1660
low524 FPS
medium419 FPS
high346 FPS
ultra262 FPS
1080P
Quadro M6000 24GB
low523 FPS
medium418 FPS
high349 FPS
ultra262 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
GeForce GTX 1660
low364 FPS
medium301 FPS
high251 FPS
ultra216 FPS
1080P
Quadro M6000 24GB
low233 FPS
medium200 FPS
high166 FPS
ultra138 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
GeForce GTX 1660
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
Quadro M6000 24GB
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
GeForce GTX 1660
low183 FPS
medium168 FPS
high154 FPS
ultra132 FPS
1080P
Quadro M6000 24GB
low186 FPS
medium162 FPS
high132 FPS
ultra110 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
GeForce GTX 1660
low90 FPS
medium70 FPS
high58 FPS
ultra40 FPS
1080P
Quadro M6000 24GB
low126 FPS
medium103 FPS
high80 FPS
ultra64 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
GeForce GTX 1660
low118 FPS
medium100 FPS
high90 FPS
ultra70 FPS
1080P
Quadro M6000 24GB
low174 FPS
medium145 FPS
high116 FPS
ultra91 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
GeForce GTX 1660
low101 FPS
medium83 FPS
high68 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
Quadro M6000 24GB
low100 FPS
medium82 FPS
high63 FPS
ultra53 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
GeForce GTX 1660
low109 FPS
medium90 FPS
high73 FPS
ultra64 FPS
1080P
Quadro M6000 24GB
low114 FPS
medium94 FPS
high78 FPS
ultra66 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

GeForce GTX 1660 vs Quadro M6000 24GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1660

2019

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $4,780 less on MSRP ($219 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 2185.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 53.1 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
  • ✅Quadro M6000 24GB is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1660 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅Draws 120W instead of 250W, a 130W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M6000 24GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌Older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quadro M6000 24GB

2016

Why buy it

  • ✅26.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2016 hardware with 24 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌
    2182.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $4,999 MSRPvs$219 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 53.1 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
  • ❌108.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 120W.
  • ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro M6000 24GB is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 26.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 1660 instead at 11,639 vs 11,625, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1660 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1660 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $4,780 cheaper on MSRP at $219 vs $4,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2185.4% (53.1 vs 2.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro M6000 24GB still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 1660 vs Quadro M6000 24GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1660

The GeForce GTX 1660 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 14 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,639 points. Launch price was $219.

NVIDIA

Quadro M6000 24GB

The Quadro M6000 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 5 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,625 points. Launch price was $4,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1660 scores 11,639 and the Quadro M6000 24GB reaches 11,625 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 is built on Turing while the Quadro M6000 24GB uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 3,072 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000 24GB). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1114 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1660Quadro M6000 24GB
G3D Mark Score
11,639
11,625
Architecture
Turing
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
12 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1408
3072+118%
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.027 TFLOPS
6.844 TFLOPS+36%
Boost Clock
1785 MHz+60%
1114 MHz
ROPs
48
96+100%
TMUs
88
256+191%
L1 Cache
1.4 MB+27%
1.1 MB
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
3 MB+100%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1660 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro M6000 24GB leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1660Quadro M6000 24GB
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1660 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M6000 24GB carries 24 GB. Quadro M6000 24GB gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 317 GB/s (Quadro M6000 24GB) — a 65.1% advantage for the Quadro M6000 24GB. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1660 and 384-bit on the Quadro M6000 24GB. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 3 MB (Quadro M6000 24GB) — the Quadro M6000 24GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1660Quadro M6000 24GB
VRAM Capacity
6 GB
24 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
317 GB/s+65%
Bus Width
192-bit
384-bit+100%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
3 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 12/1 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1660Quadro M6000 24GB
DirectX
12.1
12/1
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1660) vs NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000 24GB).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1660Quadro M6000 24GB
Encoder
7th Gen NVENC
NVENC 4.0
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1660 draws 120W versus the Quadro M6000 24GB's 250W — a 70.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 500W (Quadro M6000 24GB). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1660Quadro M6000 24GB
TDP
120W-52%
250W
Recommended PSU
450W-10%
500W
Power Connector
8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
267mm
Height
111mm
112mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75°C-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
97.0+109%
46.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1660 came in at $219, while the Quadro M6000 24GB launched at $4999. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1660 was 95.6% cheaper ($4780 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 53.1 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 2.3 (Quadro M6000 24GB) — the GeForce GTX 1660 offers 2208.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1660 (2019 vs 2016).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1660Quadro M6000 24GB
MSRP
$219-96%
$4999
Performance per Dollar
53.1+2209%
2.3
Codename
TU116
GM200
Release
March 14 2019
March 5 2016
Ranking
#231
#233
Search GeForce GTX 1660 on AmazonSearch Quadro M6000 24GB on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.