GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro M6000 24GB

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro M6000 24GB

#94

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

MSRP: $6999|Avg: $4799

190%

#96

L4

MSRP: $2345|Avg: $1800

186%

#97

RTX 6000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $6799|Avg: $5500

180%

#98

RTX 5880 Ada Generation

MSRP: $6000|Avg: $6000

179%

#99

Tesla M40

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1099

176%

#100

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $3499

162%

#101

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition

MSRP: $11605|Avg: $8199

156%

#102

Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

MSRP: $4399|Avg: $3500

137%

#103

Radeon Pro W6800X Duo

MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999

127%

#104

Radeon Pro W6900X

MSRP: $6000|Avg: $5000

124%

#105

Quadro RTX 6000

MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1800

122%

#106

L40S

MSRP: $7500|Avg: $7500

115%

#107

Quadro P6000

MSRP: $5999|Avg: $1500

111%

#108

Quadro M6000

MSRP: $4999|Avg: $500

101%

#109

Quadro M6000 24GB

MSRP: $4999|Avg: $600

100%

#110

Quadro GV100

MSRP: $8999|Avg: $8999

91%

#111

Tesla P40

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $150

89%

#112

GRID RTX6000-1Q

MSRP: $6299|Avg: $1500

86%

#113

Quadro RTX 8000

MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9999

85%

#114

Quadro GP100

MSRP: $7000|Avg: $1335

84%

#115

Radeon Instinct MI60

MSRP: $6000|Avg: $600

83%

#116

Radeon Pro SSG

MSRP: $6999|Avg: $1500

67%

#117

L40

MSRP: $31000|Avg: $8174

45%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M6000 24GB lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro M6000 24GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 47.7% higher G3D Mark score and 500% more VRAM (24 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro M6000 24GB
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-47.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+47.7%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+500%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $600 for the Quadro M6000 24GB, it costs 88% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 441.5% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro M6000 24GB
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+441.5%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($75)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($600)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Quadro M6000 24GB Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Quadro M6000 24GB

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Quadro M6000 24GB

The Quadro M6000 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 5 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,625 points. Launch price was $4,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Quadro M6000 24GB's 11,625 — the Quadro M6000 24GB leads by 47.7%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Quadro M6000 24GB uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3,072 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000 24GB). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1114 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro M6000 24GB
G3D Mark Score	7,869	11,625+48%
Architecture	Turing	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	896	3072+243%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	6.844 TFLOPS+129%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+49%	1114 MHz
ROPs	32	96+200%
TMUs	56	256+357%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	1.1 MB+25%
L2 Cache	1 MB	3 MB+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro M6000 24GB
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M6000 24GB has 24 GB. The Quadro M6000 24GB offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 317 GB/s (Quadro M6000 24GB) — a 147.7% advantage for the Quadro M6000 24GB. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3 MB (Quadro M6000 24GB) — the Quadro M6000 24GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro M6000 24GB
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	24 GB+500%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	317 GB/s+148%
Bus Width	128-bit	384-bit+200%
L2 Cache	1 MB	3 MB+200%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12/1 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro M6000 24GB
DirectX	12	12/1
Vulkan	1.4+27%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000 24GB).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro M6000 24GB
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	NVENC 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Quadro M6000 24GB's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 500W (Quadro M6000 24GB). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro M6000 24GB
TDP	75W-70%	250W
Recommended PSU	300W-40%	500W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	267mm
Height	111mm	112mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+126%	46.5

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the Quadro M6000 24GB launched at $4999 and now averages $600. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 87.5% less ($525 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 19.4 (Quadro M6000 24GB) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 440.7% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).