GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 275W, a 200W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
2015Why buy it
- ✅2.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌266.7% higher power demand at 275W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 712 MHz to 1057 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,080 points.
Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 24 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,741 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile scores 10,080 and the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X reaches 9,741 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X uses GCN 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Raw compute: 4.329 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Boost clocks: 1057 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,080+3% | 9,741 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 4096+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.329 TFLOPS | 8.602 TFLOPS+99% |
| Boost Clock | 1057 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 40 | 64+60% |
| TMUs | 64 | 256+300% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X carries 4 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) — a 166.7% advantage for the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and 4096-bit on the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 512 GB/s+167% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 4096-bit+3100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X's 275W — a 114.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Power connectors: Mobile vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 195mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-73% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 195mm |
| Height | 0mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 65°C-19% |
| Perf/Watt | 134.4+280% | 35.4 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (2021 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $649 |
| Codename | GA107 | Fiji |
| Release | May 11 2021 | June 24 2015 |
| Ranking | #290 | #282 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
