GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
Popular choices:
Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is significantly newer (2021 vs 2015). The GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.5%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 712 MHz to 1057 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,080 points.
Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 24 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,741 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile scores 10,080 and the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X reaches 9,741 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X uses GCN 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Raw compute: 4.329 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Boost clocks: 1057 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,080+3% | 9,741 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 4096+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.329 TFLOPS | 8.602 TFLOPS+99% |
| Boost Clock | 1057 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 40 | 64+60% |
| TMUs | 64 | 256+300% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) — a 166.7% advantage for the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X. Bus width: 128-bit vs 4096-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 512 GB/s+167% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 4096-bit+3100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X's 275W — a 114.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Power connectors: Mobile vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 195mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-73% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 195mm |
| Height | 0mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 65°C-19% |
| Perf/Watt | 134.4+280% | 35.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $649 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $80 |
| Codename | GA107 | Fiji |
| Release | May 11 2021 | June 24 2015 |
| Ranking | #290 | #282 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
