GeForce RTX 3060 8GB
RTX 2000E Ada Generation
GeForce RTX 3060 8GB vs RTX 2000E Ada Generation Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3060 8GB vs RTX 2000E Ada Generation FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3060 8GB vs RTX 2000E Ada Generation: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3060 8GB
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $670 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 202.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 46.2 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅27.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (112 vs 88).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 2000E Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌RTX 2000E Ada Generation is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌142.9% higher power demand at 170W vs 70W.
- ❌44.9% longer card at 242mm vs 167mm.
RTX 2000E Ada Generation
2024Why buy it
- ✅1.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 170W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 242mm, a 75mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (88 vs 112), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌203.6% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.3 vs 46.2 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3060 8GB vs RTX 2000E Ada Generation Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 3060 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3060 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,208 points.
RTX 2000E Ada Generation
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,252 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3060 8GB scores 15,208 and the RTX 2000E Ada Generation reaches 15,252 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3060 8GB is built on Ampere while the RTX 2000E Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060 8GB) vs 2,816 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 8GB) vs 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 2130 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060 8GB) vs 22 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) with 112 Tensor cores vs 88.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 8GB | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,208 | 15,252 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+27% | 2816 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+6% | 12 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz | 2130 MHz+20% |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 112+27% | 88 |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+25% | 2.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 12 MB+300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28+27% | 22 |
| Tensor Cores | 112+27% | 88 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 8GB | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 8GB has 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 2000E Ada Generation carries 16 GB. RTX 2000E Ada Generation gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 240 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 8GB) vs 224 GB/s (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) — a 7.1% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 8GB. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060 8GB and 128-bit on the RTX 2000E Ada Generation. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 8GB) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) — the RTX 2000E Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 8GB | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 240 GB/s+7% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 12 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060 8GB) vs 12.2 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 8GB | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3060 8GB) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 3060 8GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 8GB | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 8GB draws 170W versus the RTX 2000E Ada Generation's 70W — a 83.3% difference. The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060 8GB) vs 650W (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 8GB | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 70W-59% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 167mm |
| Height | 112mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 89.5 | 217.9+143% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3060 8GB came in at $329, while the RTX 2000E Ada Generation launched at $999. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3060 8GB was 67.1% cheaper ($670 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 46.2 (GeForce RTX 3060 8GB) vs 15.3 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 3060 8GB offers 202% better value. The newer card here is RTX 2000E Ada Generation (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 8GB | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-67% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 46.2+202% | 15.3 |
| Codename | GA106 | AD107 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | February 12 2024 |
| Ranking | #147 | #107 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3060 8GB and RTX 2000E Ada Generation
