G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

2022

Why buy it

✅+336.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 170W instead of 247W, a 77W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Tesla C2075

2011

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,017 vs 13,170).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌45.3% higher power demand at 247W vs 170W.

GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

2022

Tesla C2075

2011

Why buy it

✅+336.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 170W instead of 247W, a 77W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,017 vs 13,170).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌45.3% higher power demand at 247W vs 170W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU better than Tesla C2075?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 13,170 vs 3,017 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is a 2022 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Tesla C2075 is a 2011 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2011, 336.5% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 2 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 336.5% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, Tesla C2075 still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.

Is Tesla C2075 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Tesla C2075 is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to an unclear MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU Benchmark Check

Tesla C2075 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Tesla C2075
1080p
low	109 FPS	82 FPS
medium	98 FPS	68 FPS
high	84 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	70 FPS	30 FPS
1440p
low	95 FPS	64 FPS
medium	83 FPS	53 FPS
high	70 FPS	34 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	21 FPS
4K
low	48 FPS	24 FPS
medium	43 FPS	22 FPS
high	30 FPS	14 FPS
ultra	26 FPS	12 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU Open Tesla C2075

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Tesla C2075
1080p
low	357 FPS	120 FPS
medium	310 FPS	92 FPS
high	248 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	195 FPS	56 FPS
1440p
low	221 FPS	79 FPS
medium	190 FPS	55 FPS
high	154 FPS	40 FPS
ultra	123 FPS	32 FPS
4K
low	108 FPS	36 FPS
medium	89 FPS	26 FPS
high	72 FPS	23 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	18 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU Open Tesla C2075

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Tesla C2075
1080p
low	593 FPS	136 FPS
medium	474 FPS	109 FPS
high	395 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	296 FPS	68 FPS
1440p
low	444 FPS	102 FPS
medium	356 FPS	81 FPS
high	296 FPS	68 FPS
ultra	222 FPS	51 FPS
4K
low	296 FPS	68 FPS
medium	237 FPS	54 FPS
high	198 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	148 FPS	34 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU Open Tesla C2075

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Tesla C2075
1080p
low	565 FPS	136 FPS
medium	474 FPS	109 FPS
high	395 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	296 FPS	68 FPS
1440p
low	444 FPS	102 FPS
medium	356 FPS	81 FPS
high	296 FPS	68 FPS
ultra	222 FPS	51 FPS
4K
low	296 FPS	68 FPS
medium	237 FPS	54 FPS
high	198 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	148 FPS	30 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU Open Tesla C2075

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU and Tesla C2075

GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,170 points.

Tesla C2075

The Tesla C2075 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 247W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,017 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU scores 13,170 versus the Tesla C2075's 3,017 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU leads by 336.5%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is built on Ampere while the Tesla C2075 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 448 (Tesla C2075). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2075).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Tesla C2075
G3D Mark Score	13,170+337%	3,017
Architecture	Ampere	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	8 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	3584+700%	448
Compute (TFLOPS)	12.74 TFLOPS+1139%	1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	48
TMUs	112+100%	56
L1 Cache	3.5 MB+298%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB+300%	0.75 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla C2075 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Tesla C2075
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla C2075 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 0.75 MB (Tesla C2075) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Tesla C2075
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+200%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	192-bit+200%	64-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB+300%	0.75 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 12 (11_0) (Tesla C2075). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Tesla C2075
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+300%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Tesla C2075).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Tesla C2075
Encoder	NVENC (7th Gen)	—
Decoder	NVDEC (5th Gen)	—
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU draws 170W versus the Tesla C2075's 247W — a 36.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 350W (Tesla C2075). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.