
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro W5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅11.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 205W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 18.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Radeon Pro W5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌156.3% higher power demand at 205W vs 80W.
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
2021Radeon Pro W5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅11.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 205W, a 125W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 18.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌156.3% higher power demand at 205W vs 80W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile better than Radeon Pro W5700?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro W5700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 41 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 288 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 195 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 151 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 672 FPS | 647 FPS |
| medium | 538 FPS | 518 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 431 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 324 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 485 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 336 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 252 FPS | 243 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 336 FPS | 324 FPS |
| medium | 269 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 168 FPS | 162 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 332 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 84 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile and Radeon Pro W5700

GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,938 points.

Radeon Pro W5700
Radeon Pro W5700
The Radeon Pro W5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1930 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,380 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile scores 14,938 and the Radeon Pro W5700 reaches 14,380 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro W5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700). Raw compute: 10.94 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile) vs 8.893 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700). Boost clocks: 1425 MHz vs 1930 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,938+4% | 14,380 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+67% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.94 TFLOPS+23% | 8.893 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1425 MHz | 1930 MHz+35% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 120 | 144+20% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro W5700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W5700 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro W5700 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700) — the Radeon Pro W5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 6+500% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5700).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile draws 80W versus the Radeon Pro W5700's 205W — a 87.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile) vs 500W (Radeon Pro W5700). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-61% | 205W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 186.7+166% | 70.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $799 |
| Codename | GA106 | Navi 10 |
| Release | January 12 2021 | November 19 2019 |
| Ranking | #214 | #163 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












