
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

RTX 2000E Ada Generation
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile vs RTX 2000E Ada Generation Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile vs RTX 2000E Ada Generation FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile vs RTX 2000E Ada Generation: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅36.4% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (120 vs 88).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 2000E Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌RTX 2000E Ada Generation is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
RTX 2000E Ada Generation
2024Why buy it
- ✅17.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (88 vs 120), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile vs RTX 2000E Ada Generation Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,938 points.

RTX 2000E Ada Generation
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,252 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile scores 14,938 and the RTX 2000E Ada Generation reaches 15,252 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile is built on Ampere while the RTX 2000E Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile) vs 2,816 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Raw compute: 10.94 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile) vs 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1425 MHz vs 2130 MHz. Ray tracing: 30 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile) vs 22 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) with 120 Tensor cores vs 88.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,938 | 15,252+2% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+36% | 2816 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.94 TFLOPS | 12 TFLOPS+10% |
| Boost Clock | 1425 MHz | 2130 MHz+49% |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 120+36% | 88 |
| L1 Cache | 3.8 MB+36% | 2.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 12 MB+300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 30+36% | 22 |
| Tensor Cores | 120+36% | 88 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile has 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 2000E Ada Generation carries 16 GB. RTX 2000E Ada Generation gives you 166.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile) vs 224 GB/s (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile and 128-bit on the RTX 2000E Ada Generation. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) — the RTX 2000E Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 16 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+50% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 12 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile) vs 12.2 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile draws 80W versus the RTX 2000E Ada Generation's 70W — a 13.3% difference. The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile) vs 650W (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 167mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W | 70W-13% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 167mm |
| Height | 0mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 186.7 | 217.9+17% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is RTX 2000E Ada Generation (2024 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $999 |
| Codename | GA106 | AD107 |
| Release | January 12 2021 | February 12 2024 |
| Ranking | #214 | #107 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














