
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

GeForce RTX 3090
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs GeForce RTX 3090 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs GeForce RTX 3090 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs GeForce RTX 3090: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,100 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 186.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 17.7 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 350W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 312mm, a 70mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3090 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (152 vs 328), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
GeForce RTX 3090
2020Why buy it
- ✅41.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅115.8% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (328 vs 152).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌275.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.7 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌75% higher power demand at 350W vs 200W.
- ❌28.9% longer card at 312mm vs 242mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs GeForce RTX 3090 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

GeForce RTX 3090
The GeForce RTX 3090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 10496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 82 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,594 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the GeForce RTX 3090's 26,594 — the GeForce RTX 3090 leads by 30.9%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 3090 uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 10,496 (GeForce RTX 3090). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 35.58 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3090). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1695 MHz. Ray tracing: 38 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 82 (GeForce RTX 3090) with 152 Tensor cores vs 328.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312 | 26,594+31% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864 | 10496+116% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS | 35.58 TFLOPS+120% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1695 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 80 | 112+40% |
| TMUs | 152 | 328+116% |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB | 10.3 MB+115% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 38 | 82+116% |
| Tensor Cores | 152 | 328+116% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3090 carries 24 GB. GeForce RTX 3090 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 936 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3090) — a 108.9% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3090. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and 384-bit on the GeForce RTX 3090. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 6 MB (GeForce RTX 3090) — the GeForce RTX 3090 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 24 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 936 GB/s+109% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3090). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3090). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3090).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the GeForce RTX 3090's 350W — a 54.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 750W (GeForce RTX 3090). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 312mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-43% | 350W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W-20% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 312mm |
| Height | 112mm | 140mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+34% | 76.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti came in at $399, while the GeForce RTX 3090 launched at $1499. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3060 Ti was 73.4% cheaper ($1100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 17.7 (GeForce RTX 3090) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 187.6% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-73% | $1499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+188% | 17.7 |
| Codename | GA104 | GA102 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #73 | #37 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














