
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+269.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌1233.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 15W.
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 200W, a 185W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,500 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
2023Why buy it
- ✅+269.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 200W, a 185W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌1233.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,500 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) make more sense than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 52 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 23 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 59 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 31 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)'s 5,500 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 269.3%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) uses Xe LPG, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 4 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1950 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+269% | 5,500 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Xe LPG |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+121500% | 4 |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1950 MHz+17% |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+540% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12_2 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12_2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs QuickSync (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | QuickSync |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)'s 15W — a 172.1% difference. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 15W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6 | 366.7+261% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) launched at $0. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) costs 100+% less ($399 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs Infinity (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) — the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) offers Infinity% better value. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9 | Infinity |
| Codename | GA104 | Meteor Lake iGPU |
| Release | December 1 2020 | December 14 2023 |
| Ranking | #73 | #495 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












