GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

CPU

GPU

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020Core: 1410 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

2023Boost: 1950 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••RTX 3060 Ti••••

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

8 GB 200

20,312

+269.3%

GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)

GeForce RTX 2080 Super with Max-Q Design

GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)

GeForce GTX 1070 SLI

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile

GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

4 GB 15

5,500

0.0%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

✅+269.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌1233.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 15W.

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 200W, a 185W reduction.
✅More future proof: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,500 vs 20,312).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

2023

Why buy it

✅+269.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 200W, a 185W reduction.
✅More future proof: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌1233.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 15W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,500 vs 20,312).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 20,312 vs 5,500 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a 2020 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a 2023 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 269.3% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 4 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $399 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 269.3% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is the newer 2023 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and lower power draw (15W vs 200W) than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) make more sense than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?

Yes. Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 200W), and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. The trade-off is that GeForce RTX 3060 Ti currently gives you 269.3% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Benchmark Check

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
1080p
low	152 FPS	85 FPS
medium	137 FPS	74 FPS
high	118 FPS	54 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	35 FPS
1440p
low	131 FPS	69 FPS
medium	107 FPS	60 FPS
high	91 FPS	40 FPS
ultra	82 FPS	25 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	26 FPS
medium	65 FPS	25 FPS
high	50 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	14 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
1080p
low	425 FPS	121 FPS
medium	366 FPS	85 FPS
high	296 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	248 FPS	39 FPS
1440p
low	272 FPS	80 FPS
medium	229 FPS	48 FPS
high	190 FPS	35 FPS
ultra	156 FPS	26 FPS
4K
low	133 FPS	38 FPS
medium	114 FPS	25 FPS
high	96 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	73 FPS	14 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
1080p
low	859 FPS	248 FPS
medium	693 FPS	198 FPS
high	602 FPS	165 FPS
ultra	457 FPS	124 FPS
1440p
low	658 FPS	186 FPS
medium	529 FPS	148 FPS
high	452 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	93 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	124 FPS
medium	346 FPS	99 FPS
high	275 FPS	78 FPS
ultra	221 FPS	57 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
1080p
low	580 FPS	141 FPS
medium	514 FPS	109 FPS
high	424 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	373 FPS	72 FPS
1440p
low	478 FPS	104 FPS
medium	427 FPS	81 FPS
high	335 FPS	64 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	51 FPS
4K
low	285 FPS	63 FPS
medium	266 FPS	49 FPS
high	234 FPS	40 FPS
ultra	195 FPS	30 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The boost clock speed is 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)'s 5,500 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 269.3%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) uses Xe LPG, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 4 (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1950 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
G3D Mark Score	20,312+269%	5,500
Architecture	Ampere	Xe LPG
Process Node	8 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	4864+121500%	4
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	1950 MHz+17%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	448 GB/s	System
Bus Width	256-bit	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12_2 (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12_2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs QuickSync (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1 (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Encoder	NVENC (Ampere)	QuickSync
Decoder	NVDEC (Ampere)	QuickSync
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)'s 15W — a 172.1% difference. The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
TDP	200W	15W-93%
Recommended PSU	600W	350W-42%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	242mm	0mm
Height	112mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	101.6	366.7+261%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) launched at $0. The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) costs 100+% less ($399 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs Infinity (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) — the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) offers Infinity% better value. The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).