GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs GRID K240Q

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020Core: 1410 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Popular choices:

VS

GRID K240Q

2013Core: 745 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 3060 Ti

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

  • +699.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Costs $101 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • Delivers 901.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 24100% longer card at 242mm vs 1mm.

GRID K240Q

2013

Why buy it

  • Measures 1mm instead of 242mm, a 241mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,541 vs 20,312).
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 25.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $500 MSRPvs$399 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than GRID K240Q?
Yes. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 20,312 vs 2,541 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a 2020 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while GRID K240Q is a 2013 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2020 generation instead of 2013, 699.4% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 2 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is about $101 cheaper on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $500 MSRP, and you are getting 699.4% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 901.7%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.
Is GRID K240Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. GRID K240Q is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $500 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce RTX 3060 TiGRID K240Q
1080p
low152 FPS102 FPS
medium137 FPS83 FPS
high118 FPS65 FPS
ultra100 FPS38 FPS
1440p
low131 FPS85 FPS
medium107 FPS69 FPS
high91 FPS50 FPS
ultra82 FPS28 FPS
4K
low77 FPS28 FPS
medium65 FPS26 FPS
high50 FPS17 FPS
ultra43 FPS15 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce RTX 3060 TiGRID K240Q
1080p
low425 FPS88 FPS
medium366 FPS62 FPS
high296 FPS48 FPS
ultra248 FPS32 FPS
1440p
low272 FPS48 FPS
medium229 FPS31 FPS
high190 FPS23 FPS
ultra156 FPS17 FPS
4K
low133 FPS18 FPS
medium114 FPS12 FPS
high96 FPS9 FPS
ultra73 FPS7 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce RTX 3060 TiGRID K240Q
1080p
low859 FPS114 FPS
medium693 FPS91 FPS
high602 FPS76 FPS
ultra457 FPS57 FPS
1440p
low658 FPS86 FPS
medium529 FPS69 FPS
high452 FPS57 FPS
ultra343 FPS43 FPS
4K
low434 FPS57 FPS
medium346 FPS46 FPS
high275 FPS38 FPS
ultra221 FPS29 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce RTX 3060 TiGRID K240Q
1080p
low580 FPS114 FPS
medium514 FPS91 FPS
high424 FPS76 FPS
ultra373 FPS57 FPS
1440p
low478 FPS86 FPS
medium427 FPS69 FPS
high335 FPS57 FPS
ultra290 FPS43 FPS
4K
low285 FPS57 FPS
medium266 FPS46 FPS
high234 FPS38 FPS
ultra195 FPS29 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and GRID K240Q

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

NVIDIA

GRID K240Q

The GRID K240Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,541 points. Launch price was $469.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the GRID K240Q's 2,541 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 699.4%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the GRID K240Q uses Kepler, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1,536 (GRID K240Q). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K240Q).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiGRID K240Q
G3D Mark Score
20,312+699%
2,541
Architecture
Ampere
Kepler
Process Node
8 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
4864+217%
1536
Compute (TFLOPS)
16.2 TFLOPS+608%
2.289 TFLOPS
ROPs
80+150%
32
TMUs
152+19%
128
L1 Cache
4.8 MB+3592%
0.13 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+700%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GRID K240Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiGRID K240Q
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K240Q has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (GRID K240Q) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiGRID K240Q
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+300%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
256-bit+300%
64-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB+700%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 11_0 (GRID K240Q). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiGRID K240Q
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)+9%
11_0
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GRID K240Q).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiGRID K240Q
Encoder
NVENC (Ampere)
Decoder
NVDEC (Ampere)
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the GRID K240Q's 225W — a 11.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (GRID K240Q). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiGRID K240Q
TDP
200W-11%
225W
Recommended PSU
600W
350W-42%
Power Connector
8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
242mm
1mm
Height
112mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
101.6+799%
11.3
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the GRID K240Q launched at $500. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 20.2% less ($101 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 5.1 (GRID K240Q) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 898% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiGRID K240Q
MSRP
$399-20%
$500
Performance per Dollar
50.9+898%
5.1
Codename
GA104
GK104
Release
December 1 2020
June 28 2013
Ranking
#73
#628