
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

GRID P40-2Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+112% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $5,300 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2928.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GRID P40-2Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,581 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1328.3% HIGHER MSRP$5,699 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020GRID P40-2Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅+112% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $5,300 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2928.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,581 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1328.3% HIGHER MSRP$5,699 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than GRID P40-2Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GRID P40-2Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GRID P40-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GRID P40-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 32 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GRID P40-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 431 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 345 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 287 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 216 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 323 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 108 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GRID P40-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and GRID P40-2Q

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

GRID P40-2Q
GRID P40-2Q
The GRID P40-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,581 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the GRID P40-2Q's 9,581 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 112%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the GRID P40-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2,048 (GRID P40-2Q). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-2Q). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GRID P40-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+112% | 9,581 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+138% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+236% | 4.825 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+41% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 152+19% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+540% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GRID P40-2Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GRID P40-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GRID P40-2Q has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2 MB (GRID P40-2Q) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GRID P40-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.1 (GRID P40-2Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GRID P40-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs NVENC 4.0 (2x) (GRID P40-2Q). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GRID P40-2Q).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GRID P40-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | NVENC 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the GRID P40-2Q's 225W — a 11.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 500W (GRID P40-2Q). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GRID P40-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-11% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+138% | 42.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the GRID P40-2Q launched at $5699. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 93% less ($5300 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1.7 (GRID P40-2Q) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 2894.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GRID P40-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-93% | $5699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+2894% | 1.7 |
| Codename | GA104 | GM204 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #73 | #433 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












