
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

GRID P40-4Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+242.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,601 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2477.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌24100% longer card at 242mm vs 1mm.
GRID P40-4Q
2013Why buy it
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 242mm, a 241mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,926 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌651.9% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020GRID P40-4Q
2013Why buy it
- ✅+242.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,601 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2477.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 242mm, a 241mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌24100% longer card at 242mm vs 1mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,926 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌651.9% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than GRID P40-4Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GRID P40-4Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 14 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 67 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and GRID P40-4Q

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

GRID P40-4Q
GRID P40-4Q
The GRID P40-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,926 points. Launch price was $469.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the GRID P40-4Q's 5,926 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 242.8%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the GRID P40-4Q uses Kepler, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1,536 (GRID P40-4Q). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-4Q).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+243% | 5,926 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Kepler |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+217% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+608% | 2.289 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 80+150% | 32 |
| TMUs | 152+19% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+3592% | 0.13 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GRID P40-4Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GRID P40-4Q has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (GRID P40-4Q) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12_1 (GRID P40-4Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the GRID P40-4Q's 225W — a 11.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (GRID P40-4Q). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-11% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 1mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+286% | 26.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the GRID P40-4Q launched at $3000. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 86.7% less ($2601 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2.0 (GRID P40-4Q) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 2445% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-87% | $3000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+2445% | 2.0 |
| Codename | GA104 | GK104 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | June 28 2013 |
| Ranking | #73 | #628 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












