
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- β +930% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 42% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 35.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
- β Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- β More future proof: Ampere (2020β2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- β700% higher power demand at 200W vs 25W.
Iris Xe Graphics MAX
2020Why buy it
- β Costs $344 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- β Draws 25W instead of 200W, a 175W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (1,972 vs 20,312).
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2020-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 35.9 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($55 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Iris Xe Graphics MAX
2020Why buy it
- β +930% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 42% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 35.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
- β Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- β More future proof: Ampere (2020β2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- β Costs $344 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- β Draws 25W instead of 200W, a 175W reduction.
Trade-offs
- β700% higher power demand at 200W vs 25W.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (1,972 vs 20,312).
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2020-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 35.9 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($55 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Iris Xe Graphics MAX?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Iris Xe Graphics MAX still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 44 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 21 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 12 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 44 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 22 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 44 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 22 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Iris Xe Graphics MAX

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Iris Xe Graphics MAX
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 31 2020. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1650 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,972 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Iris Xe Graphics MAX's 1,972 β the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 930%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Iris Xe Graphics MAX uses Generation 12.1, both on 8 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 768 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2.534 TFLOPS (Iris Xe Graphics MAX). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1650 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+930% | 1,972 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Generation 12.1 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+533% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+539% | 2.534 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1650 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+233% | 24 |
| TMUs | 152+217% | 48 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Iris Xe Graphics MAX relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Xe Graphics MAX has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+30% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs QuickSync (Iris Xe Graphics MAX). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | QuickSync |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Iris Xe Graphics MAX's 25W β a 155.6% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1W (Iris Xe Graphics MAX). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85Β°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 25W-88% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 242mm | β |
| Height | 112mm | β |
| Slots | 2 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85Β°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+29% | 78.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Iris Xe Graphics MAX launched at $55. The Iris Xe Graphics MAX costs 86.2% less ($344 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 35.9 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) β the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 41.8% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $55-86% |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+42% | 35.9 |
| Codename | GA104 | DG1 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | October 31 2020 |
| Ranking | #73 | #685 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












