GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs MOBILITY RADEON 9550

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs MOBILITY RADEON 9550 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs MOBILITY RADEON 9550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

✅+67606.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 16869.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅12598.4% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 65 MB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌300% higher power demand at 200W vs 50W.
❌24100% longer card at 242mm vs 1mm.

MOBILITY RADEON 9550

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $299 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 200W, a 150W reduction.
✅Measures 1mm instead of 242mm, a 241mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (30 vs 20,312).
❌Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌2010 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 67606.7% in PassMark G3D (20,312 vs 30), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 65 MB of VRAM, a 8nm process instead of 40nm, 38 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $299 more expensive on MSRP at $399 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 16869.1% (50.9 vs 0.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs MOBILITY RADEON 9550 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

MOBILITY RADEON 9550

The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9550's 30 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 67606.7%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 uses TeraScale 2, both on 8 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9550). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9550).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	MOBILITY RADEON 9550
G3D Mark Score	20,312+67607%	30
Architecture	Ampere	TeraScale 2
Process Node	8 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	4864+508%	800
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.2 TFLOPS+1346%	1.12 TFLOPS
ROPs	80+400%	16
TMUs	152+280%	40
L1 Cache	4.8 MB+5900%	0.08 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	MOBILITY RADEON 9550
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 carries 65 MB. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives you 12598.4% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON 9550. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.25 MB (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	MOBILITY RADEON 9550
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+12598%	0.063 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	448 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 9.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 9550). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	MOBILITY RADEON 9550
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)+33%	9.0
Max Displays	4	0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9550's 50W — a 120% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9550). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	MOBILITY RADEON 9550
TDP	200W	50W-75%
Recommended PSU	600W	350W-42%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	242mm	1mm
Height	112mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	101.6+16833%	0.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti came in at $399, while the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 launched at $100. On MSRP, MOBILITY RADEON 9550 was 74.9% cheaper ($299 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.3 (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 16866.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (2020 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	MOBILITY RADEON 9550
MSRP	$399	$100-75%
Performance per Dollar	50.9+16867%	0.3
Codename	GA104	Broadway
Release	December 1 2020	January 7 2010
Ranking	#73	#846

Search GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on Amazon

Search MOBILITY RADEON 9550 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.