
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

P106-100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+206.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 72% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 29.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $224 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
P106-100
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $175 less on MSRP ($224 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,628 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 29.6 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($224 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020P106-100
2017Why buy it
- ✅+206.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 72% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 29.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $224 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $175 less on MSRP ($224 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,628 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 29.6 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($224 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than P106-100?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is P106-100 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 31 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 51 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 298 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 75 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 298 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 72 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and P106-100

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

P106-100
P106-100
The P106-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,628 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the P106-100's 6,628 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 206.5%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the P106-100 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1,920 (P106-100). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 6.655 TFLOPS (P106-100). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+206% | 6,628 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+153% | 1920 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+143% | 6.655 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1733 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 152+27% | 120 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+586% | 0.7 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The P106-100 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the P106-100 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2 MB (P106-100) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12_1 (P106-100). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs NVENC 6th Gen (P106-100). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs NVDEC 3rd Gen.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | NVENC 6th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | NVDEC 3rd Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the P106-100's 75W — a 90.9% difference. The P106-100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (P106-100). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 250mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 75W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 250mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+15% | 88.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the P106-100 launched at $224. The P106-100 costs 43.9% less ($175 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 29.6 (P106-100) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 72% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $224-44% |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+72% | 29.6 |
| Codename | GA104 | GP104 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | December 12 2017 |
| Ranking | #73 | #529 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












